Virginia Tech
    • Log in
    View Item 
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • College of Architecture and Urban Studies (CAUS)
    • School of Public and International Affairs (SPIA)
    • Scholarly Works, School of Public and International Affairs
    • View Item
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • College of Architecture and Urban Studies (CAUS)
    • School of Public and International Affairs (SPIA)
    • Scholarly Works, School of Public and International Affairs
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The Post-public City: Experiences from Post-socialist Europe

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Hirt_Post-public_City.docx (1.191Mb)
    Downloads: 162
    Hirt_Post-public_City_PDFA.pdf (1.571Mb)
    Downloads: 805
    Date
    2014
    Author
    Hirt, Sonia
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Public space has become an increasingly important focus in the work of architects, urban designers, philosophers, geographers, sociologists and others interested in promoting a more civil and democratic society. This vigorous attention to public space as an object of design and scholarly inquiry is likely driven by two factors. The first factor is the strong purported connection between vibrant public space as a material arena and a vibrant public sphere as a social condition. Space is not just a blank canvas on which social phenomena are imprinted. Rather, it is one of the very “constructive dimensions” of social life. Open, accessible, inclusive public space may serve as venue of social interactions that teach the values of tolerance, engagement and citizenship—values that are an “essential precondition for building a public world.” Lack of such spaces may lead to the opposite: a “trained incapacity for public life.” The second factor is the recent erosion of public space. Despite its importance, public space has in recent years been increasingly replaced by explicitly private or quasi-public spatial forms that are easily accessible only to select segments of the population. Examples include malls, gated communities, exclusive suburbs, office parks, new or gentrified urban districts, etc. Ellen Dunham-Jones and June Williamson make a useful distinction between the values of community (i.e., exclusivity, membership, belonging to a group) transmitted in quasi-public spaces of the type mentioned above and those of civility (i.e., openness, inclusion, respect for otherness) transmitted in truly public spaces. This trend toward the privatization of urban space as a part of the broader privatization of the public sphere was initially highlighted in the United States and other parts of the “Western” world by scholars such as Michael Sorkin, Edward Blakeley and Nan Ellin but has by now been documented around the globe.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10919/56493
    Collections
    • Scholarly Works, School of Public and International Affairs [71]

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us
     

     

    VTechWorks

    AboutPoliciesHelp

    Browse

    All of VTechWorksCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Log inRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us