Virginia Tech
    • Log in
    View Item 
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • ETDs: Virginia Tech Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Masters Theses
    • View Item
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • ETDs: Virginia Tech Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Masters Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A Low-latency Consensus Algorithm for Geographically Distributed Systems

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    etd-03232017-095010_Arun_B_T_2017.pdf (1.810Mb)
    Downloads: 628
    Date
    2017-02-28
    Author
    Arun, Balaji
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This thesis presents Caesar, a novel multi-leader Generalized Consensus protocol for geographically replicated systems. Caesar is able to achieve near-perfect availability, provide high performance - low latency and high throughput compared to the existing state-of-the- art, and tolerate replica failures. Recently, a number of state-of-the-art consensus protocols that implement the Generalized Consensus definition have been proposed. However, the major limitation of these existing approaches is the significant performance degradation when application workload produces conflicting requests. Caesar's main goal is to overcome this limitation by changing the way a fast decision is taken: its ordering protocol does not reject a fast decision for a client request if a quorum of nodes reply with different dependency sets for that request. It only switches to a slow decision if there is no chance to agree on the proposed order for that request. Caesar is able to achieve this using a combination of wait condition and logical time stamping. The effectiveness of Caesar is demonstrated through an evaluation study performed on Amazon's EC2 infrastructure using 5 geo-replicated sites. Caesar outperforms other multi-leader (e.g., EPaxos) competitors by as much as 1.7x in presence of 30% conflicting requests, and single-leader (e.g., Multi-Paxos) by as much as 3.5x. The protocol is also resistant to heavy client loads unlike existing protocols.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10919/79945
    Collections
    • Masters Theses [21609]

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us
     

     

    VTechWorks

    AboutPoliciesHelp

    Browse

    All of VTechWorksCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Log inRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us