Mechanical Comparison of a Type II External Skeletal Fixator and Locking Compression Plate in a Fracture Gap Model

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMuro, Noelle Marieen
dc.contributor.committeechairGilley, Robert S.en
dc.contributor.committeememberKemper, Andrew R.en
dc.contributor.committeememberTempel, Marian Benitezen
dc.contributor.committeememberBarry, Sabrina L.en
dc.contributor.departmentVeterinary Medicineen
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-09T07:01:03Zen
dc.date.available2018-12-09T07:01:03Zen
dc.date.issued2017-06-16en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare the stiffness of a Type II external skeletal fixator (ESF) to a 3.5 mm locking compression plate (LCP) in axial compression, mediolateral, and craniocaudal bending in a fracture gap model. The hypothesis was that the Type II ESF would demonstrate comparable stiffness to the LCP. A bone simulant consisting of short fiber reinforced epoxy cylinders and a 40 mm fracture gap was used. The LCP construct consisted of a 12 hole 3.5 mm plate with three 3.5 mm bicortical locking screws per fragment. The Type II ESF construct consisted of 3 proximal full fixation pins (Centerface®) per fragment in the mediolateral plane, and 2 carbon fiber connecting rods. Five constructs of each were tested in non-destructive mediolateral and craniocaudal bending, and axial compression. Stiffness was determined from the slope of the elastic portion of force-displacement curves. A one-way ANOVA and a Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test were performed, with significance defined as p < 0.05. In mediolateral bending, the stiffness of the Type II ESF (mean ± standard deviation; 1584.2 N/mm ± 202.8 N/mm) was significantly greater than that of the LCP (110.0 N/mm ± 13.4 N/mm). In axial compression, the stiffness of the Type II ESF (679.1 N/mm ± 20.1 N/mm) was significantly greater than that of the LCP (221.2 N/mm ± 19.1 N/mm). There was no significant difference between the constructs in craniocaudal bending. This information can aid in decision-making for fracture fixation, although ideal stiffness for healing remains unknown.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:10955en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/86276en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectexternal skeletal fixationen
dc.subjectlocking compression plateen
dc.subjectbiologic osteosynthesisen
dc.subjectstiffnessen
dc.subjectfractureen
dc.titleMechanical Comparison of a Type II External Skeletal Fixator and Locking Compression Plate in a Fracture Gap Modelen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineBiomedical and Veterinary Sciencesen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Muro_NM_T_2017.pdf
Size:
1.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Masters Theses