Planning Change: A Case Study on Cooperative Extension's Contribution to Creating a Culture of Continuous Improvement in Educational Programs

TR Number
Date
2019-04-02
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Association for International Agricultural and Extension Education
Abstract

Introduction

Over the decades, the US Federal Government has invested billions of dollars, intellectual resources, and human capital to assist partners both domestically and internationally with addressing challenges related to global development and human welfare. This support has reached across many sectors, including agricultural and food security, human rights and governance, health, water and sanitation, and education (USAID, 2018). Accordingly, federal agencies have sought efficient models for accomplishing the work in light of an increasing world population relying on finite resources.

To this end, this case study presents a framework employed by a team of Extension and Education Specialists to work with the US Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) instructional leaders to develop a process for continuous improvement within their schools. The goal of this effort is to equip educators with the knowledge and skills needed to effectively prepare students to enter the supply pipeline as skilled workers through a college and career readiness curriculum in the DoDEA schools, which are in 9 states and US territories as well as 11 countries in Europe and Asia. The improvement planning framework emerged by drawing from a variety of leadership theories and practices that focus on change and improvement (Dufour, Dufour, Eaker, & Many, 2006; Forman, Stosich, & Bocala, 2017; Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2016; Park, Hironaka, Carver, and Nordstrum, 2013). The themes for the continuous improvement framework are: 1) a focus on purpose; 2) a recognition of change as a continuous and complex process; 3) utilizing data-based practices, structures, and systems; 4) capitalizing on relationships and professional collaboration; and 5) building capacity.

Project Methods

Guided by the five points of the continuous improvement framework, the project team, in close collaboration with DoDEA leadership, developed face-to-face and virtual professional learning activities and offered them over the course of a two-year period to instructional leaders that made up the three regional (i.e., Americas, Europe, and Pacific) Centers for Instructional Leadership (CILs), a newly developed instructional support structure for DoDEA school administrators. These activities included job-embedded learning, research-grounded implementation, follow-up support, and supplemental job-aids related to developing professional learning communities and implementing transformative coaching in order to create a culture of continuous improvement in schools. After implementation of the professional learning for CIL personnel, key procedural documents, meeting notes, personal communications between the project team and DoDEA, and focus group transcripts were analyzed to evaluate the fidelity of implementation of the continuous improvement framework.

Project Outcomes

According to the documents analyzed, purpose is the driving force of the organization; it is the overarching goal that informs improvement initiatives. DoDEA developed and used Community Strategic Plans (CSPs) to coordinate and communicate their overarching purpose and initiatives towards that purpose throughout the organization. Additionally, the current CSP focuses on change as a continuous and complex process by highlighting the progress being made and explicit next steps in the change process, specifically related to changes to the organization’s Vision and Core Values.

In order to assist with this systemic process of change, the CILs have received professional learning on focused collaboration and transformative coaching, which they have begun to roll out data-driven practices, structure and systems that support continuous improvement globally based on the organization’s stated priorities, stakeholder needs, and assessment data. Additionally, the CILs help to create consistency with the implementation of strategic initiatives that build capacity of instructional leaders throughout the three regions by capitalizing on relationships and professional collaboration both internal and external to DoDEA.

Implications

While continuous improvement is not new to education or international development initiatives, implementing it with fidelity in various contexts remains difficult (Park et al., 2013). The 5-point framework presented in this case study is based on current literature in the field of leadership development and education and provides the necessary components that Extension Specialists can implement when planning and facilitating continuous improvement in international education and training programs. DoDEA serves as an adequate case to explore this framework because it operates schools worldwide and as a result of being exempted from the educational mandates of US public schools, has removed levels of regulation that often impact change and improvement efforts in those schools. To this end, we believe that the framework is readily transferable to a variety of different contexts making it a feasible innovative model for Extension Specialists to use in international settings to create a culture of continuous improvement.

References

Dufour, R. DuFour, R., Eaker, R. & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Forman, M., Stosich, E.L., & Bocala, C. (2017). The internal coherence framework: Creating the conditions for continuous improvement in schools. Cambridge. MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.

Park, S., Hironaka, S., Carver, P. & Nordstrum, L. (2013). Continuous Improvement in Education. Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016). Kirkpatrick's four levels of training evaluation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Talent Development.

USAID. (2018). US Agency for International Development: What we do [Website]. Retrieved at https://www.usaid.gov/what-we-do

Description
Keywords
Youth Development, Community Viability, International activity
Citation