Comparing Turbulent Dispersion Models for RANS Simulations of Particle-Laden Flows
| dc.contributor.author | Stoll, Florian Lucas Julian | en |
| dc.contributor.committeechair | Palmore, John A. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Lowe, K. Todd | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Hussong, Jeanette | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Hardt, Steffen | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Mechanical Engineering | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-05T08:02:19Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2024-06-05T08:02:19Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-06-04 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | The ingestion of sand-particles into turbomachinery decreases their longevity and perfor- mance and can even lead to failure. To address these problems, studying particle-laden flows is of high interest in the field. Due to their low computational cost, RANS simulations remain the preferred method in the design phase of engineering solutions. The reduction in computational cost stems from the fact that RANS simulations neglect velocity fluctuations and solve for the time averaged velocity field. This leads to non-physical results since these velocity fluctuations affect the particle trajectories. To improve the accuracy, the simula- tions of the particles are adapted with particle dispersion models that calculate the velocity fluctuations. This work investigates the dispersion of sand particles due to different types of particle dispersion models. A converging pipe with subsequent impact plate is used for this study. Spherical sand-particles ranging in size from 5 to 100 microns in diameter are injected against the main fluid flow into the pipe. The commercial CFD software Ansys Fluent is used and the RANS simulations are run with the k-omega SST turbulence model. Variants of both the Discrete Random Walk (DRW) and Continuous Random Walk (CRW) dispersion models are looked at. Tracer particles stayed close to the center axis inside the pipe and showed the largest dispersion through the models. The dispersion was higher for the CRW compared to the DRW model for all particle sizes. Inertial particles reached the inner walls of the pipe and showed a reduced effect by the dispersion models. The dispersion for larger particles mainly depends on the particle-wall interactions. | en |
| dc.description.abstractgeneral | The movement of particles by a fluid is found in many natural and industrial processes. A prominent example from the aerospace sector is the ingestion of sand into gas turbine engines. Anybody who has seen videos or in person landings and takeoffs of helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft in dusty environments can see the large amounts of ingestion into the engines. These sand particles damage the engines and lead to a reduced lifetime, higher maintenance requirements and possible failure of the engine. To successfully predict the movement of those particles into and through the engine, simulations are an often used tool. Since the simulation of turbulent flows requires high computational effort, the most common approach is to only solve for the average of the fluid velocities over time in each location which greatly reduces the computational cost. As a result when including particles with the fluid flow, the effects that fluctuating velocities have on the movement of the particles are neglected. Models using random numbers can imitate the missing velocity fluctuations and include these effects in the simulations. There are different types of models with so-called Continuous Random Walk models calculating a continually changing fluctuating velocity as the particle travels through the domain. Discrete Random Walk models on the other hand have a constant fluctuating velocity for some time until it switches to another randomized fluctuating velocity as the particle travels through the domain. This work compares the effects of the different models on the motion of the particles. An increase in dispersion for larger and smaller particles is found for the Continuous Random Walk model. | en |
| dc.description.degree | Master of Science | en |
| dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
| dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:39571 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10919/119282 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
| dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
| dc.subject | RANS | en |
| dc.subject | Simulation | en |
| dc.subject | Multiphase | en |
| dc.subject | Particles | en |
| dc.subject | Turbulence | en |
| dc.title | Comparing Turbulent Dispersion Models for RANS Simulations of Particle-Laden Flows | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | en |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Mechanical Engineering | en |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
| thesis.degree.level | masters | en |
| thesis.degree.name | Master of Science | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1