Individual and Commune: How we balance the private and the collective in communal housing

dc.contributor.authorSedra, Nathaniel Mokhles Boshraen
dc.contributor.committeechairMcGrath, Margaritaen
dc.contributor.committeememberEdge, Kay F.en
dc.contributor.committeememberVorster, Clive R.en
dc.contributor.departmentArchitectureen
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-08T08:00:53Zen
dc.date.available2024-10-08T08:00:53Zen
dc.date.issued2024-10-07en
dc.description.abstractThe concept of a home is changing; away from the nuclear family, and towards the free-flowing collective of the commune. This thesis explores, in four parts, the new balance that must be found, between the individual and the commune. Firstly, we examine five architectural precedents. Exploring the architectural intent, use-case, and adaptation of the space, to find commonalities in their successes and failures. Secondly, we define three categories; Private, Protected, and Public; and use them to examine the spatial and relational hierarchy of association that private and public spaces require. Thirdly, combining these associations with the architectural precedents, we distill three communal archetypes: the Egalitarian, Familial, and Neighborly; exploring the hierarchy of association and relation that each creates diagrammatically and relationally. Fourthly, we design and model a commune of our own, combining a familial archetype with a rowhouse; which we explore specially and socially.en
dc.description.abstractgeneralThe concept of a home is changing; away from the traditional family, and towards the commune – a collection of individuals not necessarily related biologically. This thesis explores, in four parts, the design of individual and social spaces needed to create a successful commune. Firstly, we examine five historical examples to understand what made them succeed or fail, looking for similarities and differences in their design. Secondly, we define three categories; Private, Protected, and Public; and using them, explore private and public spaces, to understand the different requirements each has. Thirdly, using the historical examples, we divide communes into three types: the Egalitarian (where all are equal), the Familial (nested families), and the Neighborly (adjacent families) with diagrams and floorplans, to understand how the communes they create are different. Fourthly, we give life to a commune of our own, combining a familial commune type with a rowhouse architectural form, to create a vibrant colorful society, using a scale model to explore spatially and socially.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Architectureen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:38041en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/121297en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en
dc.subjectIndividualen
dc.subjectCommuneen
dc.subjectPrivateen
dc.subjectPublicen
dc.subjectHousingen
dc.titleIndividual and Commune: How we balance the private and the collective in communal housingen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineArchitectureen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Architectureen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sedra_NM_T_2024.pdf
Size:
86.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections