Laboratory-based tasks in the diagnosis of ADHD in adults: a theoretical and empirical analysis

dc.contributor.authorButcher, Andrew Timothyen
dc.contributor.committeechairOllendick, Thomas H.en
dc.contributor.committeememberFinney, Jack W.en
dc.contributor.committeememberClum, George A. Jr.en
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:50:12Zen
dc.date.adate2008-11-18en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:50:12Zen
dc.date.issued1996-05-04en
dc.date.rdate2008-11-18en
dc.date.sdate2008-11-18en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to empirically evaluate the diagnostic utility of the Conners CPT and the P ASAT as a laboratory-based measures of attention, vigilance, working memory, and sustained mental effort in clinic-referred adults with and without ADHD. Moreover, the study was conducted in order to obtain additional evidence in ongoing efforts to clarify the classification and phenomenological status of ADHD in adults. Subjects were adults seeking psychological evaluation for a variety of presenting problems including, emotional, occupational, relational, and/or adjustment, difficulties. Standardized clinical evaluations were conducted and structured clinical interviews were used to determine clinical diagnosis and group membership (ADHD vs. Non-ADHD). It was hypothesized that ADHD adults would exhibit significantly more comorbid psychopathology, learning problems, and verbal memory deficits than non-ADHD adults. It was also hypothesized that the findings from the CPT (Conners, 1992) and P ASAT (Gronwall, 1977) would reliably discriminate these groups (ADHD and non-ADHD) of clinic-referred adults. While ADHD adults did not exhibit a higher frequency of learning disabilities, they did have significantly more comorbid psychopathology and were much more likely to experience clinically impairing deficits in verbal memory functioning. The combined results of the laboratory tasks accurately identified diagnostic group status in over 9 of 10 cases for ADHD adults and in approximately 8 of 10 cases for non-ADHD adults. The relevance of these findings for the psychiatric classification and experiential nature of ADHD in adults, as well as the clinical diagnostic utility of these laboratory measures for adult ADHD is discussed.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen
dc.format.extentvii, 104 leavesen
dc.format.mediumBTDen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-11182008-063506en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11182008-063506/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/45866en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartLD5655.V855_1996.B883.pdfen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 37002146en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectlaboratory tasksen
dc.subjectattention-deficit/hyperactivity disorderen
dc.subjectadultsen
dc.subjectADHDen
dc.subjectdiagnosisen
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V855 1996.B883en
dc.titleLaboratory-based tasks in the diagnosis of ADHD in adults: a theoretical and empirical analysisen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychologyen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V855_1996.B883.pdf
Size:
3.53 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Collections