Cumulative Impacts of Watershed-Scale Hyporheic Stream Restoration on Nitrate Loading to Downstream Waterbodies

Excess nutrient pollution and eutrophication are widespread problems that must be solved at watershed scales, and stream restoration is increasingly implemented as a solution. Yet few studies evaluate the cumulative effects of multiple individual restoration projects on watershed-scale nutrient loading. We constructed a HEC-RAS model of stream restoration implemented throughout a generic 4th order watershed typical of the Piedmont physiographic province of the eastern USA. We simulated restoration of hyporheic exchange as one increasingly popular technique that receives dissolved nitrate-nitrogen (NO3--N) mitigation credit under the Chesapeake Bay TMDL. We populated the model with hyporheic exchange (0.3% of surface flow per hyporheic-exchange inducing in-stream restoration structure) and NO3--N removal (supply-limited denitrification removes all NO3--N that enters the hyporheic zone) values from prior literature on in-stream structures and related restoration techniques. We then varied the percentage of stream channels in the watershed in which restoration occurred. For watersheds with less than 100% of stream channels restored, we also varied where in the watershed (i.e. stream order) that restoration occurred. We found that hyporheic restoration in our 4th order watersheds has the potential to reduce NO3--N loading to downstream waterbodies by up to 83%, but that a maximum of <100% reduction exists given certain watershed characteristics. Model results revealed a nonlinear relationship between percent of stream channels restored and percent NO3--N loading reduction that occurred at the watershed outlet. This indicates that the effects of individual projects are not linearly additive, and must be evaluated in the context of how much of the watershed has already been restored. We also found that restoration was more effective at reducing NO3--N loading when it occurred in higher order streams (e.g., 3rd and 4th order), yielding load reductions upward of 30% compared to < 10% in lower order streams (e.g., 1st and 2nd order). Thus, the location of an individual restoration project within a watershed is important in determining its effect on NO3--N. Overall, our results indicate that hyporheic restoration can have significant effects on watershed NO3--N loading to downstream waterbodies, yet the watershed must be viewed as a whole to understand the potential impacts of any particular project under consideration.