Estimating Heat Tolerance of Tree Buds in the Southeastern United States

TR Number

Date

2021-01-11

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Virginia Tech

Abstract

Tree diameter, bark thickness and texture, litter bulk density and chemistry, and sprouting ability are a few, species-specific adaptations and properties that may be related to an individual tree stem's potential fire resistance. Based upon these features and others, trees exhibiting similar characteristics have been broadly classified as pyrophytic or pyrophobic. To our knowledge, few if any, research studies have been conducted to determine if tree buds may exhibit speciesspecific fire or heat tolerance. Understanding potential relationships between bud characteristics and fire tolerance may assist prescribed fire managers as they target control of specific undesired tree species while promoting desired tree species. Buds of six common hardwood species in the southeastern U.S. were harvested and exposed to different heat dosages using a propane gas tube burner: red maple (Acer rubrum L.), yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.), American beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.), mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa Lam.), scarlet oak (Quercus coccinea Münchh.), and chestnut oak (Quercus montana Willd.). These species are commonly categorized as pyrophobic (American beech, red maple, yellow-poplar) and pyrophytic (chestnut oak, mockernut hickory, scarlet oak). Using electrolyte leakage of heated and unheated buds, the mean difference in bud percent mortality between heated and unheated buds was compared by species, functional group, and differing heat dosages. The mean difference in bud percent mortality differed between the heated and unheated buds by species (p < 0.0001). Heated buds of yellow-poplar, mockernut hickory, and chestnut oak displayed similar percent mortality; however, the presumed pyrophytic species had greater heated bud percent mortality (34.0 %) than the pyrophobic species (26.8 %) (p = 0.0003). Heated bud percent mortality differed based upon differing heat dosage levels (height above the propane burner and heat exposure time) and their species-specific interactions. Fire tolerance, as assigned and assessed by features such as bark texture and thickness, may not be directly related to mid-story tree bud physical properties (i.e. length, mass, and diameter) or fire tolerance. Research including additional species, heat dosages, and different sampling times (i.e. late fall vs. late winter) would be valuable for investigating these dynamics further. Deploying a similar, field-scale experiment before and after prescribed burns would be useful to determine how tree buds may respond to different heat dosages that could be exacted during prescribed burns.

Description

Keywords

Prescribed Fire, Silviculture

Citation

Collections