An evaluation of visual and verbal based standards for landscape assessment

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Songen
dc.contributor.departmentLandscape Architectureen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:38:05Zen
dc.date.adate2009-06-11en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:38:05Zen
dc.date.issued1994en
dc.date.rdate2009-06-11en
dc.date.sdate2009-06-11en
dc.description.abstractExisting verbal standards accepted in visual resource management (U.S.D.A. Forest Service, 1975 and U.S.D.I., Bureau of Land Management, 1980) as a reference for evaluating the landscape have certain shortcomings. One hypothesis is that visual images of the landscape which are used as a basis or standard along with landscape descriptions for measuring different levels or categories of a landscape attribute (visual standards) will produce more consistent ratings than using verbal standards. The purpose of this thesis is to examine the use of visual standards as a predictive tool to improve landscape assessment. This study involved the development of visual standards and a comparative survey study. One group of survey respondents was asked to rate or evaluate selected landscape variables (complexity and vividness) for a set of 15 landscape scenes. Another group used more traditional verbal standards to evaluate the same variables for the same landscape scenes. The effects of visual standards was compared with the effect of verbal standards on (1) assessing the landscape; (2) people’s attitudes toward landscape ratings; and (3) people’s attitudes toward the rating process. The findings indicate that using visual standards cannot produce more consistent results for rating landscape variables. Further research needs to be conducted for excluding the external variables which may affect the quality of visual standards. In fact, there is evidence to suggest that visual standards are perceived by the user as a more accurate reference. The findings also indicate that using visual standards result in a broader use of the rating scale particularly at the lower end of the scale and cause lower rating results for the tested scenes compared to verbal standards. Although using visual standards to access complexity and vividness cannot improve their predictive relationship to preference, the past research indicating a strong relationship between landscape complexity and visual quality may be influenced or biased by people’s preference for the landscape. In terms of the use of image based visual standards in computer application, this limited research has been unable to find any clear advantages in terms or reliability or validity. However, visual standards do not appear to be any less reliable and valid than verbal standards.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Landscape Architectureen
dc.format.extentviii, 115 leavesen
dc.format.mediumBTDen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-06112009-063806en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06112009-063806/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/43186en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartLD5655.V855_1994.Z5367.pdfen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 31217412en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V855 1994.Z5367en
dc.subject.lcshLandscape assessment -- Methodologyen
dc.titleAn evaluation of visual and verbal based standards for landscape assessmenten
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineLandscape Architectureen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Landscape Architectureen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V855_1994.Z5367.pdf
Size:
74.72 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

Masters Theses