A comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for the modeling of land disposal of petroleum exploration and production waste

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorChoong, Peng Keeen
dc.contributor.committeechairParker, Jack C.en
dc.contributor.committeememberGallagher, Daniel L.en
dc.contributor.committeememberNovak, John T.en
dc.contributor.departmentEnvironmental Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:42:57Zen
dc.date.adate2009-08-18en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:42:57Zen
dc.date.issued1991-05-05en
dc.date.rdate2009-08-18en
dc.date.sdate2009-08-18en
dc.description.abstractThree uncertainty analysis methods, namely : (1) Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, (2) First-Order Second Moment (FOSM) method, and (3) Modified Point Estimate (MPE) method, were compared in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy for evaluation of contaminant concentration at a down-gradient receptor. Benzene and chloride, two contaminants most commonly found in petroleum exploration and production waste, were analyzed for two waste disposal scenarios, i.e. (1) closed waste pit, and (2) landspreading. Using MC method as the basis for comparison, results of the analysis suggested the use of FOSM method as the most attractive alternative to the more tedious MC method. Based on 2000 MC simulations for analysis, the FOSM method required 1.053% of the computational effort required for the MC analysis. Considering a regulatory guideline of 85% probability level of exceedance, results of the analysis indicated that the MPE method consistently underestimated the benzene concentration and overestimated the chloride concentration at a receptor, whereas the FOSM analyses indicate good agreement with MC method. However, in the event where a more precise and complete analysis is mandatory, the MC method remains the most appropriate methodology available.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen
dc.format.extentx, 110 leavesen
dc.format.mediumBTDen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-08182009-040359en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-08182009-040359/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/44280en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartLD5655.V855_1991.C566.pdfen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 24339161en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V855 1991.C566en
dc.subject.lcshPetroleum waste -- Researchen
dc.titleA comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for the modeling of land disposal of petroleum exploration and production wasteen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineEnvironmental Planningen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V855_1991.C566.pdf
Size:
4.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

Masters Theses