Flow Control Optimization for Improvement of Fan Noise Reduction

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorRaven, Hans Rafaelen
dc.contributor.committeechairNg, Wing Faien
dc.contributor.committeememberDancey, Clinton L.en
dc.contributor.committeememberBurdisso, Ricardo A.en
dc.contributor.departmentMechanical Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:30:16Zen
dc.date.adate2006-04-04en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:30:16Zen
dc.date.issued2004-05-06en
dc.date.rdate2006-04-04en
dc.date.sdate2006-01-07en
dc.description.abstractThe study of the flow of a fan blade was conducted to improve tonal fan noise reduction by optimizing an existing flow control configuration. The current configuration consisted of a trailing edge Slot with a flow control area of 0.045 in² per inch span with an exit angle of -3.3° with respect to the blade exit angle. Two other flow control configurations containing discrete jets were investigated. For the first configuration, the trailing edge jets (TEJ), the fan blade was modified with discrete jets spaced 0.3 inches apart with a flow control area of 0.01 in² per inch span positioned on the trailing edge aimed at -3.3° with respect to the blade exit angle. Similarly, discrete jets were also placed on the suction surface at 95.5% chord aimed at 15° with respect to the local blade surface. This configuration is referred to as the suction surface jet (SSJ). The discrete jets for both configurations were designed to be choked while injecting a mass flow rate of 1.00% of the fan through-flow. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) was used to model new configurations and study subsequent changes in total pressure deficit using a blade design inlet Mach number of 0.73, Reynolds number based on chord length of 1.67 à 106, and design incidence angle of 0°. Experimental testing was later conducted in a 2D cascade tunnel. The TEJ and SSJ were tested at design blowing of 1.00% and at off-design conditions of 0.50%, 0.75%, and 1.25% fan through-flow. Results between the different flow control configurations were compared using a blowing coefficient. CFD showed the TEJ and SSJ offered aerodynamic improvement over the Slot configuration. Testing showed the SSJ outperformed the TEJ, as validated in CFD, producing wider and shallower wakes. SSJ area-averaged pressure losses were 25% less than TEJ at design. Noise predictions based on CFD findings showed that both TEJ and SSJ provided additional tonal sound power level attenuation over the Slot configuration at similar blowing coefficients, with the SSJ providing the most attenuation. Noise prediction based on experimental results concurred that the SSJ provided more total attenuation than the TEJ. Experimental results showed that the SSJ performed better aerodynamically and, based on analytical prediction, provided 2 dB more total attenuation than the TEJ.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen
dc.identifier.otheretd-01072006-154907en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-01072006-154907/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/30847en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartHans_Raven_Thesis_Final.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectFanen
dc.subjectComputational fluid dynamicsen
dc.subjectComputational fluid dynamicsen
dc.subjectFan Noise Reductionen
dc.subjectCascade Testingen
dc.subjectFlow Controlen
dc.subjectWake Managementen
dc.subjectTrailing Edge Blowingen
dc.subjectSuction Surface Blowingen
dc.subjectAerodynamic Lossen
dc.titleFlow Control Optimization for Improvement of Fan Noise Reductionen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineMechanical Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hans_Raven_Thesis_Final.pdf
Size:
3.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Masters Theses