VTechWorks staff will be away for the Thanksgiving holiday beginning at noon on Wednesday, November 27, through Friday, November 29. We will resume normal operations on Monday, December 2. Thank you for your patience.
 

Trust ecology and the resilience of natural resource management institutions

Simple item page
dc.contributorVirginia Tech. Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservationen
dc.contributorVirginia Tech. Center for Leadership in Global Sustainabilityen
dc.contributorVirginia Tech. Department of Geographyen
dc.contributor.authorStern, Marc J.en
dc.contributor.authorBaird, Timothy D.en
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Leadership in Global Sustainability (CLiGS)en
dc.contributor.departmentForest Resources and Environmental Conservationen
dc.contributor.departmentGeographyen
dc.date.accessed2016-02-12en
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-16T08:03:31Zen
dc.date.available2016-02-16T08:03:31Zen
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.description.abstractThe resilience of natural resource management (NRM) institutions are largely contingent on the capacities of the people and organizations within those institutions to learn, innovate, and adapt, both individually and collectively. These capacities may be powerfully constrained or catalyzed by the nature of the relationships between the various entities involved. Trust, in particular, has been identified repeatedly as a key component of institutional relationships that supports adaptive governance and successful NRM outcomes. We apply an ecological lens to a pre-existing framework to examine how different types of trust may interact to drive institutional resilience in NRM contexts. We present the broad contours of what we term “trust ecology,” describing a conceptual framework in which higher degrees of diversity of trust, as conceptualized through richness and evenness of four types of trust (dispositional, rational, affinitive, and systems based), enhance both the efficacy and resilience of NRM institutions. We describe the usefulness and some limitations of this framework based on several case studies from our own research and discuss the framework's implications for both future research and designing more resilient governance arrangements.en
dc.description.sponsorshipVirginia Agricultural Experiment Stationen
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Food and Agriculture. Program McIntire Stennisen
dc.description.sponsorshipVirginia Tech. Open Access Subvention Funden
dc.format.extent11 p.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationStern, M. J., and T. Baird. 2015. Trust ecology and the resilience of natural resource management institutions. Ecology and Society 20(2): 14.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07248-200214en
dc.identifier.issn1708-3087en
dc.identifier.issue2en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/64831en
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss2/art14/en
dc.identifier.volume20en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherThe Resilience Allianceen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.holderStern, Marc J.en
dc.rights.holderBaird, Timothy D.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en
dc.subjectAdaptive governanceen
dc.subjectFunctional redundancyen
dc.subjectInstitutional resilienceen
dc.subjectNatural resource managementen
dc.subjectTrusten
dc.titleTrust ecology and the resilience of natural resource management institutionsen
dc.title.serialEcology and Societyen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Trust_ecology_and_the_resilience.pdf
Size:
217.35 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

Scholarly Works, Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation
Open Access Subvention Fund Articles
Scholarly Works, Center for Leadership in Global Sustainability (CLiGS)
Scholarly Works, Geography