Reducing resilience debt: Mechanical felling and repeated prescribed fires may sustain eastern oak forests

dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Melanie K.en
dc.contributor.authorHagan, Donald L.en
dc.contributor.authorCoates, T. Adamen
dc.contributor.authorDeFeo, Julia A.en
dc.contributor.authorCallaham, Mac A. Jr.en
dc.contributor.authorMohr, Helen H.en
dc.contributor.authorWaldrop, Thomas A.en
dc.contributor.authorWurzburger, Ninaen
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-13T16:01:02Zen
dc.date.available2026-02-13T16:01:02Zen
dc.date.issued2025-10en
dc.description.abstractThe misalignment of species adaptations with current environmental conditions can cause ecosystems to lose resilience, accumulate resilience debt, and transition to another state. Such a state change is evident in eastern North American broadleaf forests where dominant tree species are shifting from oaks (Quercus spp.) to mesophytic species such as maples (Acer spp.). The replacement of oaks is widespread and threatens the ecosystem services these forests provide, generating interest in using forest management to halt or reverse this change. The national Fire and Fire Surrogate (FFS) study was a large-scale study of forest management practices, and the Green River FFS site in western North Carolina (initiated in 2001) offers the opportunity to understand how management actions affect oak forest resilience. The Green River FFS site implemented three experimental treatments replicated across three spatial blocks: mechanical felling of saplings and ericaceous shrubs (Mech), prescribed fire (Fire), and a combination (Mech + Fire), which were compared to untreated controls (Control). Here, we used this long-running experiment to evaluate oak forest resilience by examining changes in overstory basal area and forest composition among overstory trees, saplings, and seedlings. We found that basal area increased in the Control and Mech treatments, was unchanged in the Fire treatment, and decreased in the Mech + Fire treatment as a result of mortality. Oak sapling abundances increased with reduced basal area, a pattern not found with the major mesophytic representative, maples. This suggests that oaks are well positioned to recruit to the overstory where basal area has decreased due to overstory mortality, and at the Green River FFS site, this was best achieved in the Mech + Fire treatment. Creating conditions where oak saplings have an advantage over maples requires the mortality of some overstory trees, including desirable oaks. Taken together, our findings suggest that the misalignment of oak traits and current environmental conditions has led to resilience debt, which may be reduced when management actions mimic a severe disturbance that results in the opening of the canopy. Thus, management actions that combine mechanical felling and repeated prescribed fires may promote sustained oak dominance in the future.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.extent11 page(s)en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifierARTN e70125 (Article number)en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/eap.70125en
dc.identifier.eissn1939-5582en
dc.identifier.issn1051-0761en
dc.identifier.issue7en
dc.identifier.orcidCoates, Thomas [0000-0001-7628-0035]en
dc.identifier.pmid41111267en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/141254en
dc.identifier.volume35en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.relation.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41111267en
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.subjectecological memoryen
dc.subjectfire severityen
dc.subjectmesophicationen
dc.subjectorganic horizonen
dc.subjecttree recruitmenten
dc.subjecttree regenerationen
dc.subject.meshQuercusen
dc.subject.meshConservation of Natural Resourcesen
dc.subject.meshFiresen
dc.subject.meshForestryen
dc.subject.meshNorth Carolinaen
dc.subject.meshForestsen
dc.titleReducing resilience debt: Mechanical felling and repeated prescribed fires may sustain eastern oak forestsen
dc.title.serialEcological Applicationsen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.otherArticleen
dc.type.otherJournalen
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-08-28en
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Techen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Natural Resources & Environmenten
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Natural Resources & Environment/Forest Resources and Environmental Conservationen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/All T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Natural Resources & Environment/CNRE T&R Facultyen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2025 Taylor et al Ecological Applications.pdf
Size:
1.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: