Preparing Educators to Employ Design-Based Engineering Practices in K-12 Science
dc.contributor.author | Carlson, James Starr | en |
dc.contributor.committeechair | Wells, John G. | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Foster, Patrick Neal | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Ernst, Jeremy V. | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Williams, Thomas O. | en |
dc.contributor.department | Teaching and Learning | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-07T08:02:17Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2017-06-07T08:02:17Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2017-06-06 | en |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study was to characterize a methodological framework for preparing science educators to implement design-based engineering practices to intentionally teach targeted science content. Using a modified Delphi the study looked to answer the following research questions (RQs): RQ1: How should teacher educators prepare K-12 pre-service science teachers to define engineering problems as one of eight NGSS practices all students should acquire through science education?, RQ2: How should teacher educators prepare K-12 pre-service science teachers to design engineering solutions as one of eight NGSS practices all students should acquire through science education? and , RQ3: How should teacher educators prepare K-12 pre-service science teachers to intentionally teach targeted science content using their newly acquired abilities to define engineering problems and design engineering solutions? During Round 1 a panel of 20 (8 science and 12 technology) education experts responded to 5 open-ended questions that focused on identifying the competencies and instructional strategies used to prepare K-12 pre-service science teachers to intently teach science using engineering design. Each question resulted in identifying approximately 50 themes per question. These themes were then used to construct the Round 2 Questionnaire. During Round 2 panelists reached agreement on 283 characteristics of a framework for preparing future science educators. In Round 3, panelists were sent 87 contested Round 2 items. Results of the Round 3 data analysis indicted an additional 31 framework characteristics. The results of this study identify the essential characteristics of a methodological framework that can serve to prepare science educators on the implementation of design-based engineering practices that intentionally teach targeted science content. | en |
dc.description.degree | Ph. D. | en |
dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:12023 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/77938 | en |
dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
dc.subject | Teaching Competencies | en |
dc.subject | Instructional Strategies | en |
dc.subject | Design-Based Engineering Practices | en |
dc.subject | Teacher Education | en |
dc.subject | Delphi | en |
dc.title | Preparing Educators to Employ Design-Based Engineering Practices in K-12 Science | en |
dc.type | Dissertation | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | Curriculum and Instruction | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en |
thesis.degree.name | Ph. D. | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1