Fusing Modeling and Testing to Enhance Environmental Testing Approaches
| dc.contributor.author | Devine, Timothy Andrew | en |
| dc.contributor.committeechair | Tarazaga, Pablo Alberto | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Kurdila, Andrew J. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Martin, Luke Andrew | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Mechanical Engineering | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-31T07:00:23Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2020-12-31T07:00:23Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-07-09 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | A proper understanding of the dynamics of a mechanical system is crucial to ensure the highest levels of performance. The understanding is frequently determined through modeling and testing of components. Modeling provides a cost effective method for rapidly developing a knowledge of the system, however the model is incapable of accounting for fluctuations that occur in physical spaces. Testing, when performed properly, provides a near exact understanding of how a pat or assembly functions, however can be expensive both fiscally and temporally. Often, practitioners of the two disciplines work in parallel, never bothering to intersect with the other group. Further advancement into ways to fuse modeling and testing together is able to produce a more comprehensive understanding of dynamic systems while remaining inexpensive in terms of computation, financial cost, and time. Due to this, the goal of the presented work is to develop ways to merge the two branches to include test data in models for operational systems. This is done through a series of analytical and experimental tasks examining the boundary conditions of various systems. The first venue explored was an attempt at modeling unknown boundary conditions from an operational environment by modeling the same system in known configurations using a controlled environment, such as what is seen in a laboratory test. An analytical beam was studied under applied environmental loading with grounding stiffnesses added to simulate an operational condition and the response was attempted to be matched by a free boundaries beam with a reduced number of excitation points. Due to the properties of the inverse problem approach taken, the response between the two systems matched at control locations, however at non-control locations the responses showed a large degree of variation. From the mismatch in mechanical impedance, it is apparent that improperly representing boundary conditions can have drastic effects on the accuracy of models and recreational tests. With the progression now directed towards modeling and testing of boundary conditions, methods were explored to combine the two approaches working together in harmony. The second portion of this work focuses on modeling an unknown boundary connection using a collection of similar testable boundary conditions to parametrically interpolate to the unknown configuration. This was done by using data driven models of the known systems as the interpolating functions, with system boundary stiffness being the varied parameter. This approach yielded near identical parametric model response to the original system response in analytical systems and showed some early signs of promise for an experimental beam. After the two conducted studies, the potential for extending a parametric data driven model approach to other systems is discussed. In addition to this, improvements to the approach are discussed as well as the benefits it brings. | en |
| dc.description.abstractgeneral | A proper understanding of the dynamics of a mechanical system in a severe environment is crucial to ensure the highest levels of performance. The understanding is frequently determined through modeling and testing of components. Modeling provides a cost-effective method for rapidly developing a knowledge of the system; however, the model is incapable of accounting for fluctuations that occur in physical spaces. Testing, when performed properly, provides a near exact understanding of how a pat or assembly functions, however, can be expensive both fiscally and temporally. Often, practitioners of the two disciplines work in parallel, never bothering to intersect with the other group and favoring one approach over the other for various reasons. Further advancement into ways to fuse modeling and testing together can produce a more comprehensive understanding of dynamic systems subject to environmental excitation while remaining inexpensive in terms of computation, financial cost, and time. Due to this, the presented work aims to develop ways to merge the two branches to include test data in models for operational systems. This is done through a series of analytical and experimental tasks examining the boundary conditions of various systems and attempting to replicate the system response using inverse approaches at first. This is then proceeded by modeling boundary stiffnesses using data-driven modeling and parametric modeling approaches. The validity and impact these methods may have are also discussed. | en |
| dc.description.degree | Master of Science | en |
| dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
| dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:21111 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/101685 | en |
| dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
| dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
| dc.subject | Environmental Testing | en |
| dc.subject | Dynamics | en |
| dc.subject | Data-Driven Modeling | en |
| dc.subject | Parametric Modeling | en |
| dc.title | Fusing Modeling and Testing to Enhance Environmental Testing Approaches | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | en |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Mechanical Engineering | en |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
| thesis.degree.level | masters | en |
| thesis.degree.name | Master of Science | en |