Optimizing Laser and Liquid Nitrogen Treatments for Weed Control in Turfgrass Systems

dc.contributor.authorRomero Cubas, Juan R.en
dc.contributor.committeechairAskew, Shawn D.en
dc.contributor.committeememberGoatley, James Michaelen
dc.contributor.committeememberMcCall, David Scotten
dc.contributor.departmentPlant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Scienceen
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T08:02:51Zen
dc.date.available2025-05-28T08:02:51Zen
dc.date.issued2025-05-27en
dc.description.abstractThe increasing prevalence of herbicide-resistant weeds and growing environmental concerns surrounding synthetic pesticides are driving innovation in non-chemical weed control technologies. This research evaluated two emerging approaches based on the premise of machine-vision-based, individual-plant treatments to problematic turfgrass weeds: cryogenic liquid exposure and patterned laser energy. In the cryogenic study, a custom-built applicator was used to deliver precise doses of liquid nitrogen (LN) to individual plants of goosegrass (Eleusine indica) and annual bluegrass (Poa annua). Four field trials were conducted across two sites in Blacksburg, VA, testing seven LN doses (0–5.1 mL). LN reduced green cover rapidly (3 days after treatment) in both species, with 90% control achieved at ≥2.2 mL. Annual bluegrass responded consistently across trials, while goosegrass exhibited site-dependent recovery. In the laser study, a 10 W diode laser was used to treat four turf and weed species across varying pattern-averaged energy densities (PAED), pattern line spacings, and pass numbers to simulate systems where patterns of equidistant lines would be targeted to unwanted weeds in turf. A factorial design revealed that 4-mm line spacing improved control compared 1- or 2-mm line spacing, likely due to increased line-specific energy density. Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) fully recovered from all treatments within 24 days, while creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) had recovered less than 50%, emphasizing the need for accurate weed targeting systems. These results demonstrate the feasibility of LN and laser-based precision weed control in turfgrass systems and highlight the importance of dose optimization and spatial pattern design to balance efficacy with turfgrass safety. Future work should focus on integrating these tools with autonomous delivery platforms for scalable, selective weed management.en
dc.description.abstractgeneralAs weeds develop mechanisms to survive herbicide treatments and public concern grows over the effects of chemical herbicides, the search for safer and more sustainable weed control methods becomes increasingly important—especially in areas like golf courses, sports fields, and lawns, where appearance and safety are critical. This project evaluated two innovative, non-chemical approaches: one using extreme cold (liquid nitrogen) and another using focused heat (a laser beam). The main target weeds included annual bluegrass, smooth crabgrass, and goosegrass, while common turfgrasses like bermudagrass and creeping bentgrass were tested for treatment safety. In the liquid nitrogen (LN) trials, a custom-built applicator delivered precise amounts of LN to individual weed plants. Across four field trials in Blacksburg, VA, seven doses ranging from 0 to 5.1 mL were applied. Both species showed a rapid decline in green cover within three days, and doses of 2.2 mL or more achieved over 90% control. Annual bluegrass responded consistently across locations, while goosegrass recovery varied depending on the site. The laser study used a 10-watt diode laser to apply energy in line patterns with varying energy levels, spacing, and number of passes. A 4-mm line spacing provided better weed control than narrower spacings, likely due to greater energy concentration per line. Bermudagrass recovered fully within 24 days, while creeping bentgrass recovered less than 50%, underscoring the need for precise targeting to avoid injury to desirable turf. Overall, the results demonstrate strong potential for LN and laser-based methods in selective, non-chemical weed control. Success depends on optimizing both dose and spatial pattern. Future work should focus on integrating these approaches with automated systems to enable efficient, large-scale implementation.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science in Life Sciencesen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:43897en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/134253en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectOrganic weed controlen
dc.subjectLaser weed controlen
dc.subjectCryogenic liquidsen
dc.titleOptimizing Laser and Liquid Nitrogen Treatments for Weed Control in Turfgrass Systemsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinePlant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Scienceen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science in Life Sciencesen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Romero_Cubas_JR_T_2025.pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Romero_Cubas_JR_T_2025_support_3.pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supporting documents
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Romero_Cubas_JR_T_2025_support_1.pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supporting documents

Collections