Politics and land reform: the case of Esperanza, the Dominican Republic

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Kristine Katherineen
dc.contributor.committeechairRichardson, Bonham C.en
dc.contributor.committeememberGrossman, Lawrence S.en
dc.contributor.committeememberBrooker-Gross, Susan R.en
dc.contributor.departmentGeographyen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:32:28Zen
dc.date.adate2010-03-30en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:32:28Zen
dc.date.issued1992-02-05en
dc.date.rdate2010-03-30en
dc.date.sdate2010-03-30en
dc.description.abstractThe case of Esperanza in the Dominican Republic illustrates graphically that land reform is used by governmental leaders as a political tool; although land reform is continuously promised in the Dominican Republic, it is rarely delivered. The state has realized autonomy from class factions by alternately appeasing different class factions (Grindle 1986). The promise and occasional delivery of land reform in the Dominican Republic is one of the most powerful tools the governmental leaders have to appease the Dominican peasantry. Through the promise of reform, governmental leaders are able to control the rural campesinos while the economic position of the peasantry is continually compromised; campesinos are increasingly forced to live dualistic lives as wage laborers and farmers (de Janvry 1981; Grindle 1986). This thesis centers attention on Esperanza, a small village in the northwestern part of the country. The sugar mill there has been closed, and the Dominican President Joaquin Balaguer has promised much of Esperanza's land to land reform. As I have shown, the promised land reform has been unsuccessful. Further, I suggest that the promise of reform in Esperanza was made more for pragmatic political reasons than for humanitarian ones. Balaguer was lacking support in his 1990 bid for reelection, and he used land reform in Esperanza both to bolster his weak standings at the polls and to stifle rumbling complaints about the other closed sugar mills whose land had gone exclusive to large land holders, Dole Pineapple for one, at the expense of the rural dwellers. Moreover, recipients of land in Esperanza were from Ba1aguer>s political party.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen
dc.format.extentix, 115 leavesen
dc.format.mediumBTDen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-03302010-020121en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-03302010-020121/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/41808en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartLD5655.V855_1992.H868.pdfen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 25923045en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V855 1992.H868en
dc.subject.lcshLand reform -- Dominican Republic -- Esperanzaen
dc.subject.lcshPeasants -- Dominican Republicen
dc.subject.lcshDominican Republic -- Politics and government -- 1961-en
dc.subject.lcshEsperanza (Dominican Republic)en
dc.titlePolitics and land reform: the case of Esperanza, the Dominican Republicen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineGeographyen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V855_1992.H868.pdf
Size:
3.81 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Masters Theses