Risk factors for vulvar dysplasia recurrence in patients from southwestern Virginia and surrounding states: A retrospective cohort study

dc.contributor.authorGreer, Heather O.en
dc.contributor.authorMetz, Kallieen
dc.contributor.authorLocklear, Tonja M.en
dc.contributor.authorArmbruster, Shannon D.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-15T14:33:56Zen
dc.date.available2025-04-15T14:33:56Zen
dc.date.issued2025en
dc.description.abstractObjective. To determine whether distance to a tertiary care center is an independent risk factor for recurrence of VIN 2/3 or invasive vulvar cancer. Methods. A retrospective chart review included individuals with VIN 2/3 from southwest Virginia and surrounding states treated at a single institution. The patients were treated from 1/1/2010 to 12/31/2020. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, risks factors, distance to care determined by a geographic information system (GIS) software, treatment modality, and recurrent disease. Results. We identified 251 patients. Most patients were Caucasian (92%) and had history of tobacco use (current [49%] and former [27.5%] tobacco users). Patients traveled an average of 20 miles for care (range: 0.3-113.9 miles). Most commonly, VIN 2/3 was treated with excision (n=136), excision and ablation (n=59), or ablation alone (n=31). The average lesion size was 20 mm (range: 2, 100 mm). Thirty-five percent of patients (n=88) developed recurrent VIN 2/3, on average, 9.6 months (range: 0.1, 7.8 years) following treatment. Recurrences were associated with increased body mass index (p=0.049), immunocompromised status (p=0.039), steroid use (p=0.024), and positive margins (p=0.0003). No subsequent diagnoses of cancer were made. Logistic regression showed that margin status was the only field impacting recurrence (p=0.0075; OR=2.63, 95% CI: 1.30-5.35). Distance to care was not related to recurrence risk (p>0.05). Conclusions. Our findings confirm known risk factors for current disease, while indicating that distance to care does not impact their recurrence. Further research is merited to investigate other recurrence risk factors that were not included in our model.en
dc.description.versionSubmitted versionen
dc.identifier.eissn1933-7205en
dc.identifier.issn1933-7191en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/125197en
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectVulvar dysplasia/VINen
dc.subjectRecurrenceen
dc.subjectAppalachiaen
dc.subjectDistance traveleden
dc.subjectDisparitiesen
dc.titleRisk factors for vulvar dysplasia recurrence in patients from southwestern Virginia and surrounding states: A retrospective cohort studyen
dc.title.serialReproductive Sciencesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.otherArticleen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Techen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/VT Carilion School of Medicineen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/VT Carilion School of Medicine/OB GYNen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/VT Carilion School of Medicine/OB GYN/Maternal/Fetal Medicineen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
MasterVINSubmit-FINAL for real.docx
Size:
58.31 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Submitted version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: