VTechWorks staff will be away for the winter holidays starting Tuesday, December 24, 2024, through Wednesday, January 1, 2025, and will not be replying to requests during this time. Thank you for your patience, and happy holidays!
 

Effects of Dust Controls and Dust Sources on Respirable Coal Mine Dust Characteristics

dc.contributor.authorAnimah, Festus Ayinimien
dc.contributor.committeechairSarver, Emily Allynen
dc.contributor.committeememberPandey, Rohiten
dc.contributor.committeememberKeles, Cigdemen
dc.contributor.committeememberSchafrik, Steven J.en
dc.contributor.departmentMining Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-15T08:00:11Zen
dc.date.available2024-10-15T08:00:11Zen
dc.date.issued2024-10-14en
dc.description.abstractRespirable coal mine dust (RCMD) continues to pose serious health hazards to workers. Over the past few decades, new regulations, monitoring technologies, and improved dust controls have emerged, and all are based on the presumption that limiting RCMD on the basis of mass will effectively mitigate the exposure hazards. Given the latency of exposure outcomes, it will be some time before the full impact of these strategies can be evaluated. In the meantime, there is increasing awareness that RCMD particle characteristics, in addition to mass, might be important. This dissertation comprises four separate studies which explore the effects of primary RCMD sources and/or engineering controls on particle size and constituents. To enable a direct comparison of dust generation from primary dust sources, a field study was conducted to investigate the dust generation and particle characteristics between coal and the rock strata. Results indicated that finer and more dust was generated when mining predominantly into the rock strata versus the coal strata, while the operation of a flooded bed scrubber and an increase in water sprays pressure and volume generally suppressed dust. Prior government research, conducted within the Mining Research Division of the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) evaluated the dust mass concentrations removal efficiency of different dust controls (i.e., a dry and wet scrubber, canopy air curtain, and a wet versus dry dust collection boxes). In the second and third studies, preserved samples from these prior NIOSH dust control studies were re-analyzed and evaluated to understand their effects on dust characteristics. Results indicated that the efficiency of dust controls was particle size dependent, as these controls mostly showed no appreciable effects on dust constituents. Generally, the cleaning of dust from a novel wet dust collection box versus a traditional dry dust box led to a reduction in operator exposure to hazardous dust. In the final study, a laboratory prototype flooded bed scrubber was evaluated to understand its efficiency on dust between different particle size bins (i.e., by particle count) ranging from 0.3-10 µm. From the results, removal efficiencies were generally low – and sometimes negative, for dust particles mostly in each of the size bins less than 2 µm. The results presented here highlight the need to holistically evaluate dust controls to understand their efficiency on dust of different particle sizes and constituents, so that informed decisions can be made on the best controls to adopt in mine operations.en
dc.description.abstractgeneralCoal production contributes significantly to steel making and electricity generation in the US. During the mining process, very fine dust is generated—called "respirable" dust— which represents a significant health hazard to workers. Indeed, many cases of occupational lung diseases linked to respirable dust have been reported over the past few decades, and disease rates remain high. Dust monitoring and control efforts are largely based on limiting the total mass of respirable dust. However, there is growing evidence that specific types of dust present disproportionate hazards—including the smallest particles, which do not contribute much to total mass, and mineral particles such as silica. The research in this dissertation explores the effects of primary dust sources and controls on respirable dust size and constituents. The major findings are as follows: when using typical equipment, mining into the rock strata that surrounds the target coal seam can generate much more dust than mining the coal itself. This dust generated can be finer and contain more mineral dust like silica and silicates. Furthermore, most dust controls used to suppress dust do not appear to be selective with respect to particle type but are generally less efficient for removing finer particles. This implies that, while dust mass removal efficiency may be high, controls might still be needed where very fine dust particles pose substantial hazards. Additionally, mine operations could develop monitoring techniques and re-orient their dust controls to target and better mitigate the most hazardous primary sources of dust such as dust from the rock strata.en
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:41614en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/121339en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectDust controlen
dc.subjectRespirable dusten
dc.subjectCoalen
dc.subjectSilicaen
dc.subjectScrubbersen
dc.subjectRocken
dc.titleEffects of Dust Controls and Dust Sources on Respirable Coal Mine Dust Characteristicsen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineMining Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Animah_FA_D_2024.pdf
Size:
11.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Animah_FA_D_2024_support_1.pdf
Size:
178.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supporting documents