Studies on the Subterranean Activity of Laricobius spp. (Coleoptera: Derodontidae) using 3D X-ray Analysis and Three Imidacloprid Soil Application Techniques

Abstract

The hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA) Adelges tsugae (Annand) (Hemiptera: Adelgidae), has spread throughout most of the range of eastern hemlocks, Tsuga canadensis (L.) and the entire range of Carolina hemlocks, Tsuga caroliniana (Engelman) in eastern North America. Forest managers often implement an integrated pest management (IPM) strategy that combines chemical, silvicultural, and biological control tactics to create a more sustainable and effective approach for managing HWA. Laricobius spp. (Coleoptera: Derodontidae) are the primary biological control agents within IPM scenarios for HWA. Imidacloprid (IMI), the most widely used insecticide for HWA management, is typically applied to the soil below HWA infested trees and breaks down into several metabolites, including two with insecticidal properties; 5-hydroxy imidacloprid (5H-IMI) and imidacloprid-olefin (IMI-OLE). Imidacloprid-olefin is known to be up to 14 times as lethal to HWA as IMI and is produced as imidacloprid is first hydroxylated into 5H-IMI and further metabolized into IMI-OLE. Because Laricobius spp. spends half of its life in aestival diapause in soil below HWA infested trees, there is the potential for these biological control agents to encounter toxic residues within an IPM setting. Imidacloprid and its metabolites are known to cause mortality in Laricobius spp. feeding on HWA from previously treated trees, but the impact of soil applied imidacloprid on their subterranean survivorship has not been studied. Furthermore, there is limited knowledge on the subterranean portion of Laricobius spp. life cycle. The first study determined the depth to which Laricobius spp. burrowed during their subterranean life phase using 3D X-ray microscopy. When held in containers with two differing soil compaction intensities, 0.2 kg/cm2 and 0.5 kg/cm2, Laricobius spp. were found to burrow an average (± SE) of 2.7 ± 1.5 cm and 1.4 ± 1.3 cm deep, respectively. The second study assessed the effect of three different imidacloprid soil treatments; soil injection, soil drench and CoreTect tablets, on the subterranean survivorshiop of Laricobius spp. The soil drench application technique applied in fall 2020 consistently resulted in significantly higher IMI, 5H-IMI, and IMI-OLE residues than the other two treatments over both years of this study (2021 and 2022). The soil injection treatments from both 2020 and 2017 resulted in above average field emergence of beetles in 2021 and 2022, with relatively insignificant residue quantities present. This study suggests that the soil injection treatment method provides a lower level risk of metabolite exposure to Laricobius spp. compared to soil drench and CoreTect tablet imidacloprid application methods.