Soil CO2 Efflux and Root Productivity in a Switchgrass and Loblolly Pine Intercropping System

dc.contributor.authorShrestha, Palizaen
dc.contributor.authorSeiler, John R.en
dc.contributor.authorStrahm, Brian D.en
dc.contributor.authorSucre, Eric B.en
dc.contributor.authorLeggett, Zakiya H.en
dc.contributor.departmentForest Resources and Environmental Conservationen
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-20T18:28:08Zen
dc.date.available2017-09-20T18:28:08Zen
dc.date.issued2016-09-30en
dc.date.updated2017-09-20T18:28:08Zen
dc.description.abstractSwitchgrass intercropped with loblolly pine plantations can provide valuable feedstock for bioenergy production while providing ancillary benefits like controlling competing vegetation and enhancing soil C. Better understanding of the impact of intercropping on pine and switchgrass productivity is required for evaluating the long-term sustainability of this agroforestry system, along with the impacts on soil C dynamics (soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux; R<sub>S</sub>). R<sub>S</sub> is the result of root respiration (R<sub>A</sub>) and heterotrophic respiration (R<sub>H</sub>), which are used to estimate net C ecosystem exchange. We measured R<sub>S</sub> in intercropped and monoculture stands of loblolly pine (<i>Pinus taeda</i> L.) and switchgrass (<i>Panicum virgatum</i> L.). The root exclusion core technique was used to estimate R<sub>A</sub> and R<sub>H</sub>. The results showed pure switchgrass had significantly higher R<sub>S</sub> rates (July, August and September), root biomass and length relative to intercropped switchgrass, while there were no significant changes in R<sub>S</sub> and roots between intercropped and monoculture loblolly pine stands. A significant decrease in switchgrass root productivity in the intercropped stands versus monoculture stands could account for differences in the observed R<sub>S</sub>. The proportions of R<sub>S</sub> attributed to R<sub>A</sub> in the intercropped stand were 31% and 22% in the summer and fall respectively, indicating that the majority of the R<sub>S</sub> was heterotrophic-driven. Ancillary benefits provided by planting switchgrass between unutilized pine rows can be considered unless the goal is to increase switchgrass production.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationShrestha, P.; Seiler, J.R.; Strahm, B.D.; Sucre, E.B.; Leggett, Z.H. Soil CO2 Efflux and Root Productivity in a Switchgrass and Loblolly Pine Intercropping System. Forests 2016, 7, 221.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/f7100221en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/79297en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectPanicum virgatum L.en
dc.subjectPinus taeda L.en
dc.subjectsoil respirationen
dc.subjectintercroppingen
dc.subjectautotrophic respirationen
dc.subjectheterotrophic respirationen
dc.titleSoil CO2 Efflux and Root Productivity in a Switchgrass and Loblolly Pine Intercropping Systemen
dc.title.serialForestsen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
forests-07-00221.pdf
Size:
1.51 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: