Utilizing trait networks and structural equation models as tools to interpret multi-trait genome-wide association studies
| dc.contributor.author | Momen, Mehdi | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Campbell, Malachy T. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Walia, Harkamal | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Morota, Gota | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Animal and Poultry Sciences | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-23T14:09:50Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2019-09-23T14:09:50Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-09-18 | en |
| dc.date.updated | 2019-09-22T04:35:13Z | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Background Plant breeders seek to develop cultivars with maximal agronomic value, which is often assessed using numerous, often genetically correlated traits. As intervention on one trait will affect the value of another, breeding decisions should consider the relationships among traits in the context of putative causal structures (i.e., trait networks). While multi-trait genome-wide association studies (MTM-GWAS) can infer putative genetic signals at the multivariate scale, standard MTM-GWAS does not accommodate the network structure of phenotypes, and therefore does not address how the traits are interrelated. We extended the scope of MTM-GWAS by incorporating trait network structures into GWAS using structural equation models (SEM-GWAS). Here, we illustrate the utility of SEM-GWAS using a digital metric for shoot biomass, root biomass, water use, and water use efficiency in rice. Results A salient feature of SEM-GWAS is that it can partition the total single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects acting on a trait into direct and indirect effects. Using this novel approach, we show that for most QTL associated with water use, total SNP effects were driven by genetic effects acting directly on water use rather that genetic effects originating from upstream traits. Conversely, total SNP effects for water use efficiency were largely due to indirect effects originating from the upstream trait, projected shoot area. Conclusions We describe a robust framework that can be applied to multivariate phenotypes to understand the interrelationships between complex traits. This framework provides novel insights into how QTL act within a phenotypic network that would otherwise not be possible with conventional multi-trait GWAS approaches. Collectively, these results suggest that the use of SEM may enhance our understanding of complex relationships among agronomic traits. | en |
| dc.description.version | Published version | en |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | Plant Methods. 2019 Sep 18;15(1):107 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0493-x | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/93966 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en |
| dc.title | Utilizing trait networks and structural equation models as tools to interpret multi-trait genome-wide association studies | en |
| dc.title.serial | Plant Methods | en |
| dc.type | Article - Refereed | en |
| dc.type.dcmitype | Text | en |