Spiking Neural Networks for Low-Power Medical Applications

Artificial intelligence is a swiftly growing field, and many are researching whether AI can serve as a diagnostic aid in the medical domain. However, the primary weakness of traditional machine learning for many applications is energy efficiency, and this may hamper its ability to be effectively utilized in medicine for portable or edge systems. In order to be more effective, new energy-efficient machine learning paradigms must be investigated for medical applications. In addition, smaller models with fewer parameters would be better suited to medical edge systems. By processing data as a series of "spikes" instead of continuous values, spiking neural networks (SNN) may be the right model architecture to address these concerns. This work investigates the proposed advantages of SNNs compared to more traditional architectures when tested on various medical datasets. We compare the energy efficiency of SNN and recurrent neural network (RNN) solutions by finding sizes of each architecture that achieve similar accuracy. The energy consumption of each comparable network is assessed using standard tools for such evaluation. On the SEED human emotion dataset, SNN architectures achieved up to 20x lower energy per inference than an RNN while maintaining similar classification accuracy. SNNs also achieved 30x lower energy consumption on the PTB-XL ECG dataset with similar classification accuracy. These results show that spiking neural networks are more energy efficient than traditional machine learning models at inference time while maintaining a similar level of accuracy for various medical classification tasks. With this superior energy efficiency, this makes it possible for medical SNNs to operate on edge and portable systems.