Exploring Audience-Centered Experience (ACE) Interpretation: A study of visitor interests and live program outcomes in the U.S. National Park Service

dc.contributor.authorCaddle, Maiaen
dc.contributor.committeechairStern, Marc J.en
dc.contributor.committeememberWhittington, Anjaen
dc.contributor.committeememberPowell, Robert Beadlingen
dc.contributor.departmentForest Resources and Environmental Conservationen
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-16T09:00:20Zen
dc.date.available2026-01-16T09:00:20Zen
dc.date.issued2026-01-15en
dc.description.abstractThe National Park Service (NPS) has recently shifted interpreter training toward an audience-centered approach, emphasizing participation and personal sharing rather than one-way knowledge delivery to achieve more socially-focused program outcomes. However, the extent to which visitors want programs that invite personal sharing remains unclear. Survey data from nine NPS sites indicate that most visitors, across demographic groups, tend to prefer traditional interpreter-led programs over those involving open sharing of ideas among visitors. To better understand when these methods may be effective, this study also draws on systematic observations of 48 programs across 28 NPS units that incorporated deeper audience sharing, along with post-program surveys. Programs that emphasized human stories, connected sharing prompts to the program's theme, and fostered a safe environment to share tended to perform more strongly, though these qualities did not consistently produce improved social outcomes. Findings highlight both the potential and the limitations of audience-centered interpretation and offer guidance for future practice and research.en
dc.description.abstractgeneralThe National Park Service (NPS) has recently encouraged interpreters to create public programs that are more participatory rather than a traditional presentation. This newer approach invites the audience to share their own ideas, stories, and perspectives during programs. To understand visitors' perspectives of this shift, we surveyed visitors at nine NPS units and found that most prefer more traditional programs rather than the more modern participatory programs. To learn more about when interactive approaches work well, we also observed 48 programs across 28 parks that encouraged deeper sharing among visitors. Programs tended to be more successful when interpreters focused on human stories, clearly connected personal sharing to the central theme, and created a welcoming, comfortable environment. However, these qualities did not always lead to stronger social outcomes. Findings highlight both the potential and the limitations of audience-centered interpretation and offer guidance for future practice and research.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:45503en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/140837en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectinterpretationen
dc.subjectinformal educationen
dc.subjectdialogic interpretationen
dc.subjectpublic landsen
dc.titleExploring Audience-Centered Experience (ACE) Interpretation: A study of visitor interests and live program outcomes in the U.S. National Park Serviceen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineForestryen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Caddle_M_T_2026.pdf
Size:
492.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections