VTechWorks staff will be away for the winter holidays starting Tuesday, December 24, 2024, through Wednesday, January 1, 2025, and will not be replying to requests during this time. Thank you for your patience, and happy holidays!
 

Impact of Cattle Feeding Strategy on the Beef Metabolome

dc.contributor.authorGómez, Juan Fernando Moralesen
dc.contributor.authorCônsolo, Nara Regina Brandãoen
dc.contributor.authorAntonelo, Daniel Silvaen
dc.contributor.authorBeline, Marianeen
dc.contributor.authorGagaoua, Mohammeden
dc.contributor.authorHiguera-Padilla, Angelen
dc.contributor.authorColnago, Luiz Albertoen
dc.contributor.authorGerrard, David Edwinen
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Saulo Luzen
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-26T13:22:03Zen
dc.date.available2022-07-26T13:22:03Zen
dc.date.issued2022-07-13en
dc.date.updated2022-07-25T16:32:13Zen
dc.description.abstractThe present study explored changes in the meat metabolome of animals subjected to different finishing systems and growth rates. Thirty-six Angus &times; Nellore crossbred steers were used in a completely randomized design with four treatments: (1) feedlot system with high average daily gain (ADG; FH); (2) feedlot system with low ADG (FL); (3) pasture system with high ADG (PH); and (4) pasture system with low ADG (PL). After harvest and chilling, <i>Longissimus thoracis</i> (LT) muscle samples were taken for metabolite profile analysis using nuclear magnetic resonance. Spectrum was analyzed using chenomx software, and multi- and mega-variate data analyses were performed. The PLS-DA showed clear separation between FH and PL groups and overlap among treatments with different finishing systems but similar for matching ADG (FL and PH) treatments. Using a VIP cut-off of around 1.0, ATP and fumarate were shown to be greater in meat from PL cattle, while succinate, leucine, AMP, glutamate, carnosine, inosine, methionine, G1P, and choline were greater in meat from FH. Comparing FL and PH treatments, glutamine, carnosine, urea, NAD+, malonate, lactate, isoleucine, and alanine were greater in the meat of PH cattle, while G6P and betaine were elevated in that of FL cattle. Relevant pathways were also identified by differences in growth rate (FH versus PL) and finishing system were also noted. Growth rate caused a clear difference in meat metabolism that was highlighted by energy metabolism and associated pathways, while the feeding system tended to alter protein and lipid metabolism.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationGómez, J.F.M.; Cônsolo, N.R.B.; Antonelo, D.S.; Beline, M.; Gagaoua, M.; Higuera-Padilla, A.; Colnago, L.A.; Gerrard, D.E.; Silva, S.L. Impact of Cattle Feeding Strategy on the Beef Metabolome. Metabolites 2022, 12, 640.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12070640en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/111360en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectfeeding systemen
dc.subjectgrowth rateen
dc.subjectmetabolomicsen
dc.subjectNelloreen
dc.titleImpact of Cattle Feeding Strategy on the Beef Metabolomeen
dc.title.serialMetabolitesen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
metabolites-12-00640.pdf
Size:
1.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: