Prediction of Non-Resting Energy Expenditure using Accelerometry
| dc.contributor.author | Wilhelm, Spencer Christian | en |
| dc.contributor.committeechair | Davy, Kevin P. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Neilson, Andrew P. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Davy, Brenda M. | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-16T08:00:51Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2019-07-16T08:00:51Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-07-15 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | The accurate measurement of total energy expenditure is a cornerstone of metabolic research. However, there is a lack of measurement methods that are valid, objective, inexpensive, and easy to use. Accelerometry, along with validated prediction equations for resting energy requirements, may provide an opportunity to fill this void. Twenty weight stable adults (12 female, 8 male) who recently participated in a controlled feeding study comprised the study sample. Total energy requirements were assessed from the controlled feeding period in which weight stability was achieved using the intake-balance method. Resting energy expenditure was assessed using the Mifflin-St. Jeor equation. Participants wore accelerometers to objectively assess habitual physical activity. The accelerometer data obtained along with subjects' demographic and biometric data were used to predict non-resting energy expenditure (NREE) using step-wise linear regression in JMP. Bland-Altman plots and Spearman's Rho correlations were used to determine the validity of the total energy requirements obtained from the sum of the predicted non-resting energy expenditure. Estimated resting energy expenditure was compared with the total energy requirements assessed using the intake-balance method from the controlled feeding period. The resulting prediction equation is as follows: 480.93 – 180.69(sex) + 0.21(Accelerometer kcals) + 617.98(BF%) = AEE. The sex was coded as 1 for females and 0 for males. This prediction model has a coefficient of determination of 0.74 (0.70 adjusted). On average, the model overestimates AEE by 76 kcals. This new model could be the key to accurately, inexpensively and objectively measuring total energy requirements. | en |
| dc.description.abstractgeneral | Accurate measurement of the total amount of energy (i.e. calories) utilized by the body throughout the day, also known as total energy expenditure, is a vital component of metabolic research. However, there is a lack of measurement methods that are valid, objective, inexpensive, and easy to use. Accelerometers combined with equations designed to predict total energy expenditure may be able to fill this gap. Accelerometers are devices worn on the body that measure accelerative forces from physical activity. Twenty weight stable adults (12 female, 8 male), who recently participated in a study in which all dietary intake and exercise were closely monitored (controlled feeding study), comprised the study sample. The amount of energy needed to maintain weight (total energy requirements) was assessed from the controlled feeding period in which weight stability was achieved. Resting energy expenditure, the energy burned while the body is at rest, was assessed using an equation often used to estimate energy expenditure, the Mifflin-St. Jeor equation. Participants wore accelerometers to objectively assess habitual physical activity. The accelerometer data obtained along with subjects’ demographic (age, sex) and biometric (height, weight, BMI, etc.) data were used to predict non-resting energy expenditure (resting energy expenditure subtracted from total energy expenditure). Multiple statistical tests were used to determine the validity of the total energy requirements obtained from the sum of the predicted non-resting energy expenditure (NREE) and resting energy expenditure. Estimated resting energy expenditure was compared with the total energy requirements assessed using the intake-balance method from the controlled feeding period. The resulting prediction equation is as follows: 480.93 – 180.69(sex) + 0.21(Accelerometer kcals) + 617.98(BF%) = NREE. The sex was coded as 1 for females and 0 for males. This prediction model has a coefficient of determination of 0.74 (0.70 adjusted), which means 70% of the variation in non-resting energy expenditure was explained by changes in the variables in the equation. On average, the model overestimates NREE by 76 Calories per day. This new model could be the key to accurately, inexpensively and objectively measuring total energy requirements. | en |
| dc.description.degree | Master of Science | en |
| dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
| dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:20091 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/91463 | en |
| dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
| dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
| dc.subject | Non-resting energy expenditure | en |
| dc.subject | accelerometry | en |
| dc.subject | intake balance | en |
| dc.subject | prediction equation | en |
| dc.title | Prediction of Non-Resting Energy Expenditure using Accelerometry | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | en |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise | en |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
| thesis.degree.level | masters | en |
| thesis.degree.name | Master of Science | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1