VTechWorks staff will be away for the winter holidays starting Tuesday, December 24, 2024, through Wednesday, January 1, 2025, and will not be replying to requests during this time. Thank you for your patience, and happy holidays!
 

Reform in the land of Serf and Slave, 1825-1861

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Robert Paulen
dc.contributor.committeechairNelson, Amyen
dc.contributor.committeememberWallenstein, Peter R.en
dc.contributor.committeememberMollin, Marian B.en
dc.contributor.departmentHistoryen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:36:28Zen
dc.date.adate2008-06-06en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:36:28Zen
dc.date.issued2008-04-30en
dc.date.rdate2008-06-06en
dc.date.sdate2008-05-12en
dc.description.abstractThis thesis argues that the significance of pre-Civil War southern opposition to slavery has been largely marginalized and mischaracterized by previous historiography. By contextualizing southern antislavery activism as but a single wing within a broader reformist movement, historians can move beyond simplistic interpretations of these antislavery advocates as fool-hardy and tangential "losers." While opposition to slavery constituted a key goal for these reformers, it was not their only aspiration, and they secured considerable success in other aspects of reform. Nineteenth-century Russians, simultaneously struggling with their own system of bonded labor, offer excellent counterpoints to reorient the role of antebellum southern reformers. Through their shared commitment to reforming liberalism, a preference for gradualism as the vehicle of change, and a shared intellectual framework based upon new theories of political economy, the Russian and southerners' histories highlight a transatlantic intellectual community in which southern reformers were full members. Adapting multiple theories from this transnational exchange of ideas, southern reformers were remarkably liminal figures useful for contemporary scholarly exploration into the nineteenth-century culture of reform. Ultimately, it was this liminality coupled with the inegalitarian nature of their movement that ensured that the southern antislavery movement would fail to secure a gradual demise to slavery.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Artsen
dc.identifier.otheretd-05122008-003114en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05122008-003114/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/32645en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartRPMurrayThesis.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectAntislavery Movement -- Southern Statesen
dc.subjectEmancipation -- Russiaen
dc.subjectGradualismen
dc.subjectIntellectual Movements -- Nineteenth Centuryen
dc.subjectPolitical Economy -- Nineteenth Centuryen
dc.subjectReformism --Nineteenth Centuryen
dc.subjectSerfdom – Russiaen
dc.subjectSlavery -- United Statesen
dc.subjectTransatlantic Community – Nineteenth Centuryen
dc.titleReform in the land of Serf and Slave, 1825-1861en
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineHistoryen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Artsen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RPMurrayThesis.pdf
Size:
696.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Masters Theses