Classification of ADHD and non-ADHD Using AR Models and Machine Learning Algorithms
| dc.contributor.author | Lopez Marcano, Juan L. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeechair | Beex, Aloysius A. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Bailey, Scott M. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Paul, JoAnn Mary | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Electrical and Computer Engineering | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-13T09:00:13Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2016-12-13T09:00:13Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-12-12 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | As of 2016, diagnosis of ADHD in the US is controversial. Diagnosis of ADHD is based on subjective observations, and treatment is usually done through stimulants, which can have negative side-effects in the long term. Evidence shows that the probability of diagnosing a child with ADHD not only depends on the observations of parents, teachers, and behavioral scientists, but also on state-level special education policies. In light of these facts, unbiased, quantitative methods are needed for the diagnosis of ADHD. This problem has been tackled since the 1990s, and has resulted in methods that have not made it past the research stage and methods for which claimed performance could not be reproduced. This work proposes a combination of machine learning algorithms and signal processing techniques applied to EEG data in order to classify subjects with and without ADHD with high accuracy and confidence. More specifically, the K-nearest Neighbor algorithm and Gaussian-Mixture-Model-based Universal Background Models (GMM-UBM), along with autoregressive (AR) model features, are investigated and evaluated for the classification problem at hand. In this effort, classical KNN and GMM-UBM were also modified in order to account for uncertainty in diagnoses. Some of the major findings reported in this work include classification performance as high, if not higher, than those of the highest performing algorithms found in the literature. One of the major findings reported here is that activities that require attention help the discrimination of ADHD and Non-ADHD subjects. Mixing in EEG data from periods of rest or during eyes closed leads to loss of classification performance, to the point of approximating guessing when only resting EEG data is used. | en |
| dc.description.degree | Master of Science | en |
| dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
| dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:9180 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/73688 | en |
| dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
| dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
| dc.subject | EEG | en |
| dc.subject | ADHD | en |
| dc.subject | Classification | en |
| dc.subject | Machine learning | en |
| dc.subject | KNN | en |
| dc.subject | SVM | en |
| dc.subject | GMM | en |
| dc.subject | Autoregressive Coefficients | en |
| dc.title | Classification of ADHD and non-ADHD Using AR Models and Machine Learning Algorithms | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | en |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Electrical Engineering | en |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
| thesis.degree.level | masters | en |
| thesis.degree.name | Master of Science | en |