Findings: Relationships of old and new, past and present

dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Lopez, Yamilet E.en
dc.contributor.committeechairBrown, William W.en
dc.contributor.committeememberSchnoedt, Heinrichen
dc.contributor.committeememberNiles, Jerome A.en
dc.contributor.committeememberGalloway, William U.en
dc.contributor.committeememberO'Brien, Michael J.en
dc.contributor.departmentArchitectureen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:52:52Zen
dc.date.adate1998-10-28en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:52:52Zen
dc.date.issued1997-10-31en
dc.date.rdate1999-10-28en
dc.date.sdate1997-10-31en
dc.description.abstract"Only with the language of the present can we get the past to speak." Sverre Fehn "A poet doesn't produce a different language for each poem. That's not necessary; he uses the same language, he uses even the same words. In music it is always the same instruments most of the time. I think that is the same in Architecture." Mies van der Rohe ' ...within this structure,... the elements 'keep one another in a state of equilibrium in accordance with fixed rules', and ' a language is a system in which the value of any one element depends on the simultaneous coexistence of all the others'." Ferdinand Saussure The connection of one building to another can be seen through a universal architectural language. Buildings are structured through the use of this language. Architecture communicates thoughts and ideas through the elements of building. The architect may show us things very subtly or dramatically using this language. Light, wind, material, color, water, even a wall are only a few of the elements of architectural discourse. Like letters form words and words form sentences, architectural elements are placed in order from which a possible meaning derived. The relationships between elements tell stories of different kinds. Within the structure of the architectural language the elements remain the same; their configuration, however, changes to reveal new and different meanings. Configuration is various; the use of these elements link past to present. Language A. Structure 1. Syntactic 2. Semantic 3. Pragmatic B. Elements 1. Letter 2. Word Architecture A. Structure 1. Syntactic 2. Semantic 3. Pragmatic B. Elements 1. Materials 2. Columns, walls, roof, floor, light, etc.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Architectureen
dc.format.extent49 leavesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-22798-192320en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-22798-192320/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/46477en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartYAMILET.PDFen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 40004337en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectAdaptive reuseen
dc.subjectArchitectural languageen
dc.subjectArchitectureen
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V855 1997.M382en
dc.titleFindings: Relationships of old and new, past and presenten
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineArchitectureen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Architectureen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
YAMILET.PDF
Size:
4.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections