Implementation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Smoke-Free Rule: A Socio-Ecological Qualitative Assessment of Administrator and Resident Perceptions

dc.contributor.authorHorn, Kimberlyen
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Sallie B.en
dc.contributor.authorRincón-Gallardo Patiño, Sofíaen
dc.contributor.authorKrost, Kevinen
dc.contributor.authorGray, Tiffanyen
dc.contributor.authorDearfield, Craigen
dc.contributor.authorDu, Chenguangen
dc.contributor.authorBernat, Debraen
dc.contributor.departmentPopulation Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.departmentHuman Nutrition, Foods, and Exerciseen
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Educationen
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-26T18:48:20Zen
dc.date.available2021-08-26T18:48:20Zen
dc.date.issued2021-08-24en
dc.date.updated2021-08-26T13:27:36Zen
dc.description.abstractIn July 2018, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) implemented a mandatory smoke-free rule in public housing. This study assessed administrator and resident perceptions of rule implementation during its initial year in the District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA). Assessment included nine focus groups (<i>n</i> = 69) with residents and in-depth interviews with administrators (<i>n</i> = 7) and residents (<i>n</i> = 26) from 14 DCHA communities (family = 7 and senior/disabled = 7). Semi-structured discussion guides based on the multi-level socio-ecological framework captured dialogue that was recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded inductively. Emerging major themes for each socio-ecological framework level included: (1) Individual: the rule was supported due to perceived health benefits, with stronger support among non-smokers; (2) Interpersonal: limiting secondhand smoke exposure was perceived as a positive for vulnerable residents; (3) Organizational: communication, signage, and cessation support was perceived as a need; (4) Community: residents perceived mobility, disability, weather, and safety-related issues as barriers; and (5) Public Policy: lease amendments were perceived as enablers of rule implementation but expressed confusion about violations and enforcement. A majority of administrators and residents reported favorable implications of the mandated HUD rule. The novel application of a socio-ecological framework, however, detected implementation nuances that required improvements on multiple levels, including more signage, cessation support, clarification of enforcement roles, and addressing safety concerns.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationHorn, K.; Johnson, S.B.; Patiño, S.R.-G.; Krost, K.; Gray, T.; Dearfield, C.; Du, C.; Bernat, D. Implementation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Smoke-Free Rule: A Socio-Ecological Qualitative Assessment of Administrator and Resident Perceptions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8908.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18178908en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/104734en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectsmoke-free policyen
dc.subjecthousingen
dc.subjecttobacco controlen
dc.subjectsmokingen
dc.subjecthealth policyen
dc.subjectsocio-ecological frameworken
dc.subjectqualitativeen
dc.titleImplementation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Smoke-Free Rule: A Socio-Ecological Qualitative Assessment of Administrator and Resident Perceptionsen
dc.title.serialInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ijerph-18-08908.pdf
Size:
360.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: