Shoulder kinematics during cyclic overhead work are affected by a passive arm support exoskeleton
dc.contributor.author | Casu, Giulia | en |
dc.contributor.author | Barajas-Smith, Isaiah | en |
dc.contributor.author | Barr, Alan | en |
dc.contributor.author | Phillips, Brandon | en |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Sunwook | en |
dc.contributor.author | Nussbaum, Maury A. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Rempel, David | en |
dc.contributor.author | Pau, Massimiliano | en |
dc.contributor.author | Harris-Adamson, Carisa | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-29T18:54:24Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-29T18:54:24Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2024-07-25 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: We investigated the influence of passive arm-support exoskeleton (ASE) with different levels of torque (50, 75, and 100%) on upper arm osteokinematics. Methods: Twenty participants completed a cyclic overhead drilling task with and without ASE. Task duration, joint angles, and angular acceleration peaks were analyzed during ascent and descent phases of the dominant upper arm. Results: Maximum ASE torque was associated with decreased peak acceleration during ascent (32.2%; SD 17.8; p < 0.001) and descent phases (38.8%; SD 17.8; p < 0.001). Task duration remained consistent. Increased torque led to a more flexed (7.2°; SD 5.5; p > 0.001) and internally rotated arm posture (17.6°; SD 12.1; p < 0.001), with minimal changes in arm abduction. Conclusion: The small arm accelerations and changes in osteokinematics we observed, support the use of this ASE, even while performing overhead cyclic tasks with the highest level of support. | en |
dc.description.version | Accepted version | en |
dc.identifier | 104357 (Article number) | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104357 | en |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1872-9126 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-6870 | en |
dc.identifier.orcid | Nussbaum, Maury [0000-0002-1887-8431] | en |
dc.identifier.other | S0003-6870(24)00134-0 (PII) | en |
dc.identifier.pmid | 39059032 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10919/120743 | en |
dc.identifier.volume | 121 | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en |
dc.relation.uri | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39059032 | en |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en |
dc.subject | Arm acceleration | en |
dc.subject | Joint angles | en |
dc.subject | Passive exoskeleton | en |
dc.title | Shoulder kinematics during cyclic overhead work are affected by a passive arm support exoskeleton | en |
dc.title.serial | Applied Ergonomics | en |
dc.type | Article - Refereed | en |
dc.type.dcmitype | Text | en |
dc.type.other | Journal Article | en |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-07-16 | en |
pubs.organisational-group | /Virginia Tech | en |
pubs.organisational-group | /Virginia Tech/Engineering | en |
pubs.organisational-group | /Virginia Tech/Engineering/Industrial and Systems Engineering | en |
pubs.organisational-group | /Virginia Tech/Faculty of Health Sciences | en |
pubs.organisational-group | /Virginia Tech/All T&R Faculty | en |
pubs.organisational-group | /Virginia Tech/Engineering/COE T&R Faculty | en |