A Mixed Methods Study Evaluating Strategies used in Organizational Visioning

dc.contributor.authorBrunton, Kelsey Churchen
dc.contributor.committeechairKaufman, Eric K.en
dc.contributor.committeememberFriedel, Curtis R.en
dc.contributor.committeememberWestfall-Rudd, Donna M.en
dc.contributor.departmentAgricultural and Extension Educationen
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-21T08:00:33Zen
dc.date.available2013-06-21T08:00:33Zen
dc.date.issued2013-06-20en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this case study is to evaluate two methods of strategic planning within organizational visioning: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis and Appreciative inquiry (Ai).  SWOT analysis is a method of strategic planning that is popular within companies and organizations due to its simple, yet thorough, approach.  Ai has recently emerged as an approach to strategic visioning and planning within organizational development.  However, little research has been conducted to evaluate either approach to organizational visioning, and there is a growing need to compare the two techniques.  In this case study, participants within one organization were divided, with half of the staff participating in Ai and the other half participating in SWOT.  Data for this mixed methods study was gathered through observation, focus group interviews, and pre-test, post-test, and delayed post assessments tests.  Through the explanatory sequential design, quantitative data evaluated the change in organizational commitment and vision clarity as a result of the interventions; while, qualitative data further explored participants\' perception of the intervention process and resulting effects.  The study found a statistically significant interaction between intervention treatments and the pre-test and post-test scores within the organizational commitment construct.  Seven themes emerged from the qualitative data; however, only two themes were specifically associated with an intervention treatment.  Participants in the SWOT intervention described the visioning process to be frustrating and negative; while, Ai participants found that the visioning process confirmed many of their beliefs and values about the department.  Recommendations for future practice suggest the use of Strengths, Opportunities, Aspiration, Results (SOAR) as an approach that combines and maximizes Ai and SWOT.  Suggestions for future research are to explore SWOT as a precursor to di-visioning within the Visioning Process Model.      en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science in Life Sciencesen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:949en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/23254en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectOrganizational Visioningen
dc.subjectAppreciative Inquiryen
dc.subjectSWOT Analysisen
dc.subjectOrganizational Commitmenten
dc.subjectVision Clarityen
dc.titleA Mixed Methods Study Evaluating Strategies used in Organizational Visioningen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineAgricultural and Extension Educationen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science in Life Sciencesen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 5 of 7
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Brunton_KC_T_2013.pdf
Size:
3.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Brunton_KC_T_2013_support_1.pdf
Size:
89.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supporting documents
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Brunton_KC_T_2013_support_3.pdf
Size:
74.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supporting documents
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Brunton_KC_T_2013_support_4.pdf
Size:
10.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supporting documents
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Brunton_KC_T_2013_support_5.pdf
Size:
157.94 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supporting documents

Collections