Evaluation of Methods to Determine Usual Ultra-Processed Food Intake Using 24-Hour Dietary Recalls

dc.contributor.authorHudson, Summeren
dc.contributor.committeechairDavy, Brenda Muelleren
dc.contributor.committeememberHedrick, Valisa Ellenen
dc.contributor.committeememberSavla, Jyoti Shitalen
dc.contributor.departmentHuman Nutrition, Foods and Exerciseen
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-04T08:02:10Zen
dc.date.available2025-06-04T08:02:10Zen
dc.date.issued2025-06-03en
dc.description.abstractUltra-processed foods (UPF), defined by their extensive industrial processing and poor nutritional quality, likely pose significant health risks and dominate modern diets. Reducing UPF consumption could lead to better health outcomes. Definitions of food processing levels in classification systems such as Nova are somewhat subjective, which could lead to inconsistencies in categorizing foods. Food misclassification could impact research findings on the relationship between processed food consumption and health. This study's objective was to evaluate an approach to determine usual UPF intake using 24-hour dietary recalls and Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) software. Dietary data was utilized from participants in two ongoing randomized controlled trials of UPF intake and health. Participants (n=47) completed three 24-hour recalls obtained using recommended procedures. Two raters independently categorized each food consumed according to the Nova system, consistent with published "best practices". Using dietary data for each 24-h dietary recall, we calculated each participant's intake of the four Nova groups: 1) minimally processed foods, 2) processed culinary ingredients, 3) processed foods, and 4) ultra-processed foods. The relative contribution to daily energy intake (percentage of total energy) and daily food intake in grams (% of total grams) were calculated. Inter-rater reliability for Nova classifications of foods was determined using Intra-Class Correlations (ICC). A paired sample t-test was used to evaluate the % UPF kcal and % UPF grams calculations between raters. The findings suggest that the Nova classification system can be applied with reasonable consistency by trained raters and may be a useful tool for estimating usual UPF intake in research settings. However, variability in dietary recall detail and food descriptions highlights the importance of using standardized classification procedures to ensure reliability in UPF-related dietary assessments. Continued refinement of these methods will be essential for improving accuracy in dietary research and informing public health strategies aimed at reducing UPF consumption.en
dc.description.abstractgeneralUltra-processed foods (UPFs) are products that go through extensive industrial processing, often resulting in poor nutritional quality. These foods make up a large part of modern diets and have been linked to serious health problems. Reducing UPF consumption may help improve health, but accurately measuring how much UPF people eat can be challenging. Existing systems used to classify foods by processing levels, like the Nova system, can sometimes lead to disagreements on how foods are categorized, which might affect the accuracy of research findings. This study explored a method to measure usual UPF intake by analyzing what people eat over three separate 24-hour periods using detailed dietary recall tools. Foods were categorized into four processing groups: minimally processed, processed ingredients, processed foods, and ultra-processed foods. Two independent raters classified the foods using the Nova system, and results were compared to check for consistency. The amount of each person's daily food intake (in calories and grams) comes from UPFs was also calculated. The findings will help refine methods for studying the impact of UPFs on health and improve the reliability of food classification systems.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:43945en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/135024en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectultra-processed foodsen
dc.subject24-hour recallsen
dc.subjectreliabilityen
dc.titleEvaluation of Methods to Determine Usual Ultra-Processed Food Intake Using 24-Hour Dietary Recallsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineHuman Nutrition, Foods, and Exerciseen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hudson_S_T_2025.pdf
Size:
4.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections