Development of a Test Method for Evaluating the Ability of Headgear to Reduce Head Kinematics During Rugby Head Impacts
dc.contributor.author | Wood, Matthew Owen | en |
dc.contributor.committeechair | Rowson, Steven | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Begonia, Mark T. | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Stark, Nicole Elizabeth | en |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-07T08:01:28Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2025-06-07T08:01:28Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2025-05-22 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Rugby is a rapidly growing sport with a high risk of concussion, yet athletes are not required to wear head protection during play. The sport has primarily relied on tackle regulations to mitigate concussion risk and has imposed standards limiting soft-shell headgear's protective capabilities. However, evidence from other contact sports, including soccer, flag football, and rugby, suggests that soft-shell headgear can reduce concussion risk. Instrumented mouthguards (iMGs) provide researchers with valuable insights into head impact exposure and have been validated for accurate data collection. With the help of these mouthguards, researchers can better understand the head kinematics that occur during play. While these mouthguards are useful, further laboratory validation processes are required to ensure an accurate translation of iMG data to laboratory sensors. The research presented in this thesis had three main objectives: (1) to address gaps in translating iMG kinematic data into laboratory reconstructions; (2) to determine common head impact locations and energy levels in Super League rugby players using data collected by Leeds Beckett University; and (3) to replicate these impacts in a controlled laboratory setting to develop a comprehensive headgear rating system to inform consumers of headgear safety. Results indicate that on-field iMGs tend to underpredict peak head kinematic severity due to signal processing adjustments necessary for accurate data collection in on-field conditions. Players most frequently sustain head impacts at four common locations: the front, front boss, side, and rear boss, with impacts occurring at three distinct energy levels. Laboratory tests confirmed that headgear can reduce concussion risk, with thicker headgear demonstrating greater reductions in peak head kinematics. These findings support the potential role of headgear in mitigating head injury risk in rugby and contribute to the development of improved safety during play. | en |
dc.description.abstractgeneral | Rugby is a high-contact sport where players face a significant risk of concussion, yet head protection is not required during games to reduce the risk of concussions. While rule changes have aimed to reduce concussion risk, soft-shell headgear, though limited by current regulations, may offer additional protection. This research explored how effective headgear can be in reducing head injury risk, using data collected through instrumented mouthguards (iMGs) that track head impacts during play. While these mouthguards are useful, further laboratory validation processes are necessary to translate on-field iMG data to a laboratory setting to accurately recreate on-field head impacts. The study had three main goals: (1) to improve how real-world impact data from iMG worn by players in Super League Rugby used to inform laboratory testing conditions; (2) to identify where and how often rugby players experience head impacts; (3) to recreate these impacts in a controlled laboratory setting to evaluate how well different headgears protects the head. Findings from this research show that most impacts happen at four key areas of the head and at three different impact energies. In the lab, thicker headgear consistently offered better protection by lowering the severity of rugby head impacts. However, data collected from players on the field often underestimates how severe these impacts really are, due to how the data is processed to ensure that the mouthguards register head impacts. Overall, this research highlights the potential for better-designed headgear to reduce concussions in rugby. It also lays the groundwork for creating a safety rating system that helps players, parents, and governing bodies to choose more protective headgear to improve player safety. | en |
dc.description.degree | Master of Science | en |
dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:43797 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10919/135396 | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
dc.subject | instrumented mouthguards | en |
dc.subject | soft-shell headgear | en |
dc.subject | rugby | en |
dc.subject | concussion | en |
dc.title | Development of a Test Method for Evaluating the Ability of Headgear to Reduce Head Kinematics During Rugby Head Impacts | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | Biomedical Engineering | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
thesis.degree.level | masters | en |
thesis.degree.name | Master of Science | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1