Context Dependent Gaze Metrics for Evaluation of Laparoscopic Surgery Manual Skills
Files
TR Number
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
With the growing adoption of laparoscopic surgery practices, high quality training and qualification of laparoscopic skills through objective assessment has become critical. While eye-gaze and instrument motion analyses have demonstrated promise in producing objective metrics for skill assessment in laparoscopic surgery, three areas deserve further research attention. First, most eye-gaze metrics do not account for trainee behaviors that change the visual scene or context that can be addressed by computer vision. Second, feedforward control metrics leveraging on the relationship between eye-gaze and hand movements has not been investigated in laparoscopic surgery. Finally, eye-gaze metrics have not demonstrated sensitivity to skill progressions of trainees as the literature has focused on differences between experts and novices although feedback on skill acquisition is most useful for trainees or educators. To advance eye-gaze assessment in laparoscopic surgery, this research presents a three-stage gaze based assessment methodology to provide a standardized process for generating context-dependent gaze metrics and estimating the proficiency levels of medical trainees on surgery. The three stages are: (1) contextual scene analysis for segmenting surgical scenes into areas of interest, (2) compute context dependent gaze metrics based on eye fixation on areas of interest, and (3) defining and estimating skill proficiency levels with unsupervised and supervised learning, respectively. This methodology was applied to analyze 499 practice trials by nine medical trainees practicing the peg transfer task in the Fundamental of Laparoscopic Surgery program. The application of this methodology generated five context dependent gaze and one tool movement metrics, defined three proficiency levels of the trainees, and developed a model predicting proficiency level of a participant for a given trial with 99% accuracy. Further, two of six metrics are completely novel, capturing feed-forward behaviors in the surgical domain. The results also demonstrated that gaze metrics could reveal skill levels more precisely than between experts and novices as suggested in the literature. Thus, the metrics derived from the gaze based assessment methodology also shows high sensitive to trainee skill levels. The implication of this research includes providing automated feedback to trainees on where they have looked during practice trial and what skill proficiency level attained after each practice trial.