Preference and acceptability of four protein sources by ruminating Holstein calves

dc.contributor.authorWampler, Susan Andersonen
dc.contributor.committeechairPolan, Carl E.en
dc.contributor.committeememberBarnes, Michael A.en
dc.contributor.committeememberSiegel, Paul B.en
dc.contributor.departmentDairy Scienceen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:41:59Zen
dc.date.adate2012-08-01en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:41:59Zen
dc.date.issued1988-05-22en
dc.date.rdate2012-08-01en
dc.date.sdate2012-08-01en
dc.description.abstractFour successive groups of four calves each (~ 4 mo old) were individually penned and observed during a 14 d trial period for choice of concentrate. Prior calf diets contained soybean meal (SBM) (for two groups and distillers grains in place of SBM for two groups. Concentrates contained approximately equal amounts of corn with either SBM, peanut meal (PNM), fish meal (FSM), or corn gluten meal (CGM). Each day of four trials, .45 kg of each concentrate was randomly assigned to one of four equal feed box sections. Calf feeding position was recorded every 30 sec for no more than 50 min or until calves stopped eating. In addition, 1.36 kg of first cutting orchardgrass hay was offered twice per day. Measurements of amount of each feed consumed, order of consumption and length of time spent eating each feed were analyzed statistically to determine preference. Overall preference was for SBM, closely followed by PNM, both over FSM and CGM, with the l preference status of FSM showing the most change over time by decreasing throughout the trial periods. Neither section in which feed was offered nor previous experience with SBM significantly influenced preference. In addition, twenty calves ranging in age from 4 mo to 7 mo were divided and housed in four groups of five and observed during a 30 d trial period for acceptability of the protein feeds tested for preference. Acceptability, measured subjectively as length of time required by calves to eat each feed, was greatest for SBM, closely followed by PNM and CGM, and least for FSM. Analysis of calf weight gain showed no differences between feeds.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen
dc.format.extentvii, 69 leavesen
dc.format.mediumBTDen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-08012012-040422en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-08012012-040422/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/44093en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartLD5655.V855_1988.W356.pdfen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 18272055en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V855 1988.W356en
dc.subject.lcshCattle -- Feeding and feedsen
dc.subject.lcshHolstein-Friesian cattle -- Feeding and feedsen
dc.titlePreference and acceptability of four protein sources by ruminating Holstein calvesen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineDairy Scienceen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V855_1988.W356.pdf
Size:
3.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections