Comparative Studies of Alternative Anaerobic Digestion Technologies

dc.contributor.authorInman, David C.en
dc.contributor.committeechairNovak, John T.en
dc.contributor.committeememberRandall, Clifford W.en
dc.contributor.committeememberBoardman, Gregory D.en
dc.contributor.departmentEnvironmental Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:47:22Zen
dc.date.adate2004-11-12en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:47:22Zen
dc.date.issued2004-10-14en
dc.date.rdate2006-11-12en
dc.date.sdate2004-11-02en
dc.description.abstractWashington D.C. Water and Sewage Authority is planning to construct a new anaerobic digestion facility at its Blue Plains WWTP by 2008. The research conducted in this study is to aid the designers of this facility by evaluating alternative digestion technologies. Alternative anaerobic digestion technologies include thermophilic, acid/gas phased, and temperature phased digestion. In order to evaluate the relative merits of each, a year long study evaluated the performance of bench scale digestion systems at varying solids retention times (SRT) and organic loading rates (OLR). The digesters were fed a blend of primary and secondary residuals from the Blue Plains wastewater treatment facility. In each study phase, temperature phased anaerobic digestion was compared to single stage mesophilic digestion (the industry standard) at the same SRT. Single stage thermophilic digestion was evaluated by sampling the first thermophilic stage of the temperature phased digestion systems throughout the study. Additionally, the first phase study compared acid/gas phased digestion to temperature phased and single stage mesophilic digestion. Results of the study demonstrated that the temperature phased digestion system consistently performed better than the other systems during each study phase by having higher volatile solids reduction (VSR), higher methane production, and lower residual biological activity. The highest observed VSR during the study (67%) occurred in a temperature phased digestion system operated at 7.5 days in each stage. Based on these results, it seems a suitable candidate for the Blue Plains digestion facility. Additionally, odor studies performed in conjunction with the research presented in this paper have shown distinct advantages for the temperature phased process.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen
dc.identifier.otheretd-11022004-223730en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11022004-223730/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/35573en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartInman_2004_etd.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectthermophilicen
dc.subjecttemperature phaseden
dc.subjectmesophilicen
dc.subjectbiosolidsen
dc.subjectdigestionen
dc.subjectanaerobicen
dc.titleComparative Studies of Alternative Anaerobic Digestion Technologiesen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineEnvironmental Planningen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Inman_2004_etd.pdf
Size:
737.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections