Human Factors Evaluation of an In-Vehicle Active Traffic and Demand Management (ATDM) System
| dc.contributor.author | Sykes, Kayla Paris | en |
| dc.contributor.committeechair | Dingus, Thomas A. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeechair | Murray-Tuite, Pamela M. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Doerzaph, Zachary R. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Neurauter, Michael L. | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Civil and Environmental Engineering | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-05T08:00:16Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2016-04-05T08:00:16Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-04-04 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | This research study focused on the development and subsequent evaluation of an in-vehicle Active Traffic and Demand Management (ATDM) system deployed on I-66. The ATDM elements inside the vehicle allowed drivers to remain consistently aware of traffic conditions and roadway requirements even if external signage was inaccessible. Forty participants were accompanied by a member of the research team and experienced the following features from the in-vehicle device (IVD): 1) dynamic speed limits, 2) dynamic lane use/shoulder control, 3) High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) restrictions, and 4) variable message signs (VMS). This system was equipped with auditory and visual alerts to notify the driver when relevant information was updated. The research questions addressed distraction, desirability, and driver behavior associated with the system. Participant data was collected from the instrumented vehicle, various surveys, and researcher observation. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey-Kramer tests were performed to analyze participant eye glance durations towards the IVD and instrument cluster. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to draw conclusions from participant speed data and some survey responses. Several key findings were uncovered related to each research category: 1) the IVD would not be classified as a distraction according to NHTSA distraction guidelines, 2) seventy-three percent of participants would want the in-vehicle technology in their next vehicle, and 3) the speed limit alert motivated participants to alter their speed (based on both survey results and actual participant speed data). | en |
| dc.description.degree | Master of Science | en |
| dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
| dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:7318 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/65003 | en |
| dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
| dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
| dc.subject | Active Traffic and Demand Management (ATDM) | en |
| dc.subject | connected vehicles | en |
| dc.subject | human factors | en |
| dc.subject | Driver-Vehicle Interface (DVI) | en |
| dc.subject | Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) | en |
| dc.title | Human Factors Evaluation of an In-Vehicle Active Traffic and Demand Management (ATDM) System | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | en |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Civil Engineering | en |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
| thesis.degree.level | masters | en |
| thesis.degree.name | Master of Science | en |