Cage-Free Pullets Minimally Affected by Stocking Density Stressors

dc.contributor.authorAbraham, Meagan E.en
dc.contributor.authorRobison, Cara I.en
dc.contributor.authorSerpa, Priscila B. S.en
dc.contributor.authorStrandberg, Natalia J.en
dc.contributor.authorErasmus, Marisa A.en
dc.contributor.authorFraley, Gregory S.en
dc.contributor.authorErf, Gisela F.en
dc.contributor.authorKarcher, Darrin M.en
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-24T13:37:10Zen
dc.date.available2024-05-24T13:37:10Zen
dc.date.issued2024-05-20en
dc.date.updated2024-05-24T13:05:19Zen
dc.description.abstractManagement choices during the pullet phase can affect behavior, welfare, and health later in life, but few studies have evaluated the pullet phase, particularly in extensive housing systems. This study was a 2 &times; 2 factorial randomized complete block design (RCBD) with two strains and two stocking densities. The Lohmann LB-Lite and Lohmann LSL-Lite were housed on the floor at high-stocking density (619&ndash;670 cm<sup>2</sup>/bird) and low-stocking density (1249&ndash;1352 cm<sup>2</sup>/bird), which changed with age from 2 to 16 weeks of age (WOA). Bird-based measures of appearance, blood parameters, organ measurements, and production values were evaluated. Stocking density alone affected (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) only relative bursal weight (% of body weight)&mdash;3.32% in the low-density versus 3.08% in the high-density group. High-stocking density was correlated with decreased uniformity (high&mdash;89.33 &plusmn; 0.24%; low&mdash;90.41 &plusmn; 0.24; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.02) and worse feather coverage in the brown strain. High-stocking density was correlated with greater uniformity (High&mdash;90.39 &plusmn; 0.24%; Low&mdash;88.47 &plusmn; 0.24%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and better feather coverage in the white strain. This study&rsquo;s feed conversion ratio (FCR) was improved by 0.07 in the low-stocking density for both strains. The remaining parameters were affected by strain and age only. Thus, while stocking density effects vary slightly depending on the strain used, cage-free pullets had limited negative effects at both the high and low-stocking densities tested in this study; there were few to no changes in the numerous bird-based welfare parameters tested.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationAbraham, M.E.; Robison, C.I.; Serpa, P.B.S.; Strandberg, N.J.; Erasmus, M.A.; Fraley, G.S.; Erf, G.F.; Karcher, D.M. Cage-Free Pullets Minimally Affected by Stocking Density Stressors. Animals 2024, 14, 1513.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ani14101513en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/119090en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.titleCage-Free Pullets Minimally Affected by Stocking Density Stressorsen
dc.title.serialAnimalsen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
animals-14-01513-v2.pdf
Size:
6.15 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: