Mechanical Root Reinforcement for Slope Stability: A State-of-the-Art Review and a Proposed Trait-Based Functional Root Classification System

dc.contributor.authorDhakal, Swostikaen
dc.contributor.committeechairYerro Colom, Albaen
dc.contributor.committeememberHosseini, Reihanehen
dc.contributor.committeememberDove, Joseph E.en
dc.contributor.departmentCivil and Environmental Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-11T08:03:00Zen
dc.date.available2026-06-11T08:03:00Zen
dc.date.issued2026-06-10en
dc.description.abstractVegetation has been used for slope stabilization for centuries, with conventional measures like soil nails and piles serving to complement the root reinforcement. Vegetation contributes to reinforcement through mechanical reinforcement provided by the root, and hydro-mechanical effects associated with evapotranspiration. Despite decades of research, translating root reinforcement into engineering practice remains unclear because most studies focus on specific plant species rather than on mechanically meaningful root traits, limiting comparability and predictive capability. This paper provides a comprehensive review of root characteristics and root types relevant to mechanical root reinforcement, specifically root morphology (e.g., diameter) and architecture (e.g., orientation and root area ratio (RAR) distribution). It also reviews the state-of-the-art of existing methods for quantifying mechanical root reinforcement: theoretical models, experimental methods from laboratory to field-scale, and numerical approaches based on FEM and DEM. Building on identified gaps and the need for functional trait-based root classification, a three dimensional finite element model with an explicit representation of simplified roots is developed and validated against field scale direct shear tests on vegetated soil. A systematic parametric analysis quantifies the effects of RAR, geometric arrangement (radial vs. square), structural versus non structural root systems, and root orientation relative to the shear plane. The results show that RAR alone is insufficient to uniquely characterize mechanical root reinforcement, because root systems with the same RAR can mobilize substantially different strength increases depending on the presence of dominant structural roots, their orientation relative to the shear plane, and their spatial arrangement. Based on these findings, a functional root classification is proposed that incorporates these parameters. This classification provides a more standardized and mechanically relevant basis for geotechnical analysis, numerical modeling, and vegetation-based slope stabilization design.en
dc.description.abstractgeneralVegetation is increasingly recognized as a nature-based solution for slope stabilization, offering a sustainable alternative or complement to conventional measures such as soil nails and concrete piles. Plant roots reinforce soil through two primary mechanisms: mechanical reinforcement (roots acting like fibers that resist tension, compression, shear, bending, or a combination of these) and hydro-mechanical effects (roots extracting water from the soil through transpiration, which increases suction and improves strength). However, applying these benefits in engineering practice has been challenging because most geotechnical studies focus on specific plant species rather than on the root traits that matter for strength. This makes it difficult to compare results across different vegetation or to develop predictive models. This thesis first reviews the root characteristics that influence mechanical reinforcement, specifically root diameter, spatial arrangement, orientation, and the Root Area Ratio (i.e., the fraction of soil cross section occupied by roots). It also summarizes current methods for quantifying root reinforcement, including theoretical models, laboratory and field experiments, and computer simulations. To address identified gaps, a three‑dimensional finite element model is used in which roots are explicitly simulated as flexible elements within the soil. The model is validated against field‑scale direct shear tests on vegetated soil. A systematic parametric analysis then examined how RAR, geometric arrangement (radial vs. square patterns), structural versus non‑structural root systems (presence of a thick central anchorage root), and root orientation relative to the shear plane influence the shear strength of rooted soil. The results show that RAR alone is not sufficient to predict reinforcement performance. Root systems with the same RAR and the same number of roots can produce substantially different strength increases depending on whether they include a dominant structural root, how roots are oriented relative to potential failure planes, and how they are spatially arranged. Based on these findings, we propose a practical functional root classification system that incorporates these parameters. This classification provides a standardized, mechanically relevant framework for geotechnical analysis, numerical modeling, and vegetation based slope stabilization design across diverse plant types, including grasses, shrubs, and trees.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:47132en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/143355en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectVegetation root reinforcementen
dc.subjectState-of-the-arten
dc.subjectRoot Area Ratio (RAR)en
dc.subjectNumerical modelingen
dc.subjectRoot classificationen
dc.titleMechanical Root Reinforcement for Slope Stability: A State-of-the-Art Review and a Proposed Trait-Based Functional Root Classification Systemen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineCivil Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dhakal_S_T_2026.pdf
Size:
3.37 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dhakal_S_T_2026_support_1.pdf
Size:
102.2 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supporting documents

Collections