Comparison of Quantitative and Semi-Quantitative Assessments of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Response to Elevated Salinity in central Appalachian Coalfield Streams

dc.contributor.authorPence, Rachel A.en
dc.contributor.committeechairSchoenholtz, Stephen H.en
dc.contributor.committeechairZipper, Carl E.en
dc.contributor.committeememberMcLaughlin, Daniel L.en
dc.contributor.committeememberSoucek, David J.en
dc.contributor.departmentForest Resources and Environmental Conservationen
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-19T09:00:56Zen
dc.date.available2019-01-19T09:00:56Zen
dc.date.issued2019-01-18en
dc.description.abstractAnthropogenic salinization of freshwater is a global concern. In freshwater environments, elevated levels of major ions, measured as total dissolved solids (TDS) or specific conductance (SC), can cause adverse effects on aquatic ecosystem structure and function. In central Appalachia, eastern USA, studies largely rely on Rapid Bioassessment Protocols with semi-quantitative sampling to characterize benthic macroinvertebrate community response to increased salinity caused by surface coal mining. These protocols require subsampling procedures and identification of fixed numbers of individuals regardless of organism density, limiting measures of community structure. Quantitative sampling involves enumeration of all individuals collected within a defined area and typically includes larger sample sizes relative to semi-quantitative sampling, allowing expanded characterization of the benthic community. Working in central Appalachia, I evaluated quantitative and semi-quantitative methods for bioassessments in headwater streams salinized by coal mining during two time periods. I compared the two sampling methods for capability to detect SC-induced changes in the macroinvertebrate community. Quantitative sampling consistently produced higher estimates of taxonomic richness than corresponding semi-quantitative samples, and differences between sampling methods were found for community composition, functional feeding group, dominance, tolerance, and habit metrics. Quantitative methods were generally stronger predictors of benthic community-metric responses to SC and were more sensitive for detecting SC-induced changes in the macroinvertebrate community. Quantitative methods are advantageous compared to semi-quantitative sampling methods when characterizing benthic macroinvertebrate community structure because they provide more complete estimates of taxonomic richness and diversity and produce metrics that are stronger predictors of community response to elevated SC.en
dc.description.abstractgeneralSurface coal mining in central Appalachia, eastern USA, contributes to increased salinity of surface waters, causing adverse effects on water quality and aquatic life. Stream condition is often evaluated through sampling of benthic macroinvertebrates because they are ubiquitous in aquatic environments and differ in sensitivity to various types of pollution and environmental stressors. In central Appalachia, studies have largely relied on semi-quantitative sampling methods to characterize effects of elevated salinity on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in headwater streams. These methods are ‘semiquantitative’ because processing of samples requires subsampling procedures and identification of a fixed number of individuals, regardless of the number of organisms that were originally collected. In contrast, quantitative sampling involves identification and counting of all collected individuals, often resulting in organism counts that are much higher than those of semi-quantitative samples. Quantitative samples are typically more time-consuming and expensive to process but allow for expanded description of the benthic macroinvertebrate community and characterization of community-wide response to an environmental stressor such as elevated salinity. Working in central Appalachian streams, I compared 1) depictions of benthic macroinvertebrate community structure; 2) benthic community response to elevated salinity; and 3) the minimum levels of salinity associated with community change between quantitative and semi-quantitative methods. Quantitative sampling methods provide many advantages over semi-quantitative methods by providing more complete enumerations of the taxa present, thus enhancing the ability to evaluate aquatic-life condition and to characterize overall benthic macroinvertebrate community response to elevated salinity caused by surface coal mining.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:18611en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/86787en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectquantitative samplingen
dc.subjectcoal miningen
dc.subjectspecific conductanceen
dc.subjectcommunity structureen
dc.subjectWater qualityen
dc.titleComparison of Quantitative and Semi-Quantitative Assessments of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Response to Elevated Salinity in central Appalachian Coalfield Streamsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineForestryen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Pence_RA_T_2019.pdf
Size:
32.23 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections