Identification of Differentially Methylated Sites with Weak Methylation Effects

dc.contributor.authorTran, Hong T.en
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Hongxiaoen
dc.contributor.authorWu, Xiaoweien
dc.contributor.authorKim, Gunjuneen
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Christopher R.en
dc.contributor.authorLarose, Haileyen
dc.contributor.authorHaak, David C.en
dc.contributor.authorAskew, Shawn D.en
dc.contributor.authorBarney, Jacoben
dc.contributor.authorWestwood, James H.en
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Liqingen
dc.contributor.departmentComputer Scienceen
dc.description.abstractDeoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation is an epigenetic alteration crucial for regulating stress responses. Identifying large-scale DNA methylation at single nucleotide resolution is made possible by whole genome bisulfite sequencing. An essential task following the generation of bisulfite sequencing data is to detect differentially methylated cytosines (DMCs) among treatments. Most statistical methods for DMC detection do not consider the dependency of methylation patterns across the genome, thus possibly inflating type I error. Furthermore, small sample sizes and weak methylation effects among different phenotype categories make it difficult for these statistical methods to accurately detect DMCs. To address these issues, the wavelet-based functional mixed model (WFMM) was introduced to detect DMCs. To further examine the performance of WFMM in detecting weak differential methylation events, we used both simulated and empirical data and compare WFMM performance to a popular DMC detection tool methylKit. Analyses of simulated data that replicated the effects of the herbicide glyphosate on DNA methylation in <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> show that WFMM results in higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting DMCs compared to methylKit, especially when the methylation differences among phenotype groups are small. Moreover, the performance of WFMM is robust with respect to small sample sizes, making it particularly attractive considering the current high costs of bisulfite sequencing. Analysis of empirical <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> data under varying glyphosate dosages, and the analysis of monozygotic (MZ) twins who have different pain sensitivities—both datasets have weak methylation effects of &lt;1%—show that WFMM can identify more relevant DMCs related to the phenotype of interest than methylKit. Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) are genomic regions with different DNA methylation status across biological samples. DMRs and DMCs are essentially the same concepts, with the only difference being how methylation information across the genome is summarized. If methylation levels are determined by grouping neighboring cytosine sites, then they are DMRs; if methylation levels are calculated based on single cytosines, they are DMCs.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.identifier.citationTran, H.; Zhu, H.; Wu, X.; Kim, G.; Clarke, C.R.; Larose, H.; Haak, D.C.; Askew, S.D.; Barney, J.N.; Westwood, J.H.; Zhang, L. Identification of Differentially Methylated Sites with Weak Methylation Effects. Genes 2018, 9, 75.en
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.subjectdifferentially methylated regionsen
dc.subjectwavelet-based functional mixed modelen
dc.subjectweak methylation effecten
dc.titleIdentification of Differentially Methylated Sites with Weak Methylation Effectsen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden


Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
3.69 MB
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
1.5 KB
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission