Evaluation of herbicides for no-till corn establishment

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Paul Hillen
dc.contributor.departmentPlant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Scienceen
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-22T18:16:17Zen
dc.date.available2021-07-22T18:16:17Zen
dc.date.issued1986en
dc.description.abstractField experiments were conducted in 1984 and 1985 in Fluvanna and Montgomery Counties in Virginia, to evaluate HOE-O661 (glufosinate) [ammonium-(3-amino-3-carboxypropyl )-methyl phosphinate], cyanazine (2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino )-s-triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-methyl propionitrile)), glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] and paraquat (1,1'-dimethyl 4,4'-bipyridinium ion) for the control of vegetation existing at the time of no-till corn establishment. These herbicides were applied alone or in combination with 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] or dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid) at three timings of application. Both locations were heavily infested with annual, biennial, and perennial broadleaf weeds, including horseweed (Conyza canadensis), buckhorn plantain (Plantago lanceolata), field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis), curly dock (Rumex crispus) and wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis). All four non-selective herbicides provided good overall weed control. The addition of 2,4-D or dicamba generally improved the control of broadleaf weeds in all four experiments. Control of horseweed with paraquat was variable, but improved significantly when dicamba was applied in combination with paraquat. Glyphosate, cyanazine and HOE-O661 alone or in combination with 2,4-D or dicamba provided excellent horseweed control. Wild mustard control with glyphosate was dependent on the weed size and growth stage of development. Control with paraquat, cyanazine and HOE-0661 was not affected by differences in wild mustard size or growth stage. Glyphosate and HOE-0661 provided acceptable field bindweed control alone, and all herbicides gave excellent field bindweed control when applied in combination with 2,4-D or dicamba. Cyanazine and HOE-0661 showed better control of shoot growth on the more difficult-to-control weeds than paraquat and glyphosate when applied alone. With the addition of either 2,4-D or dicamba, cyanazine and HOE-0661 provided better overall weed control, in most cases, than corresponding paraquat and glyphosate combinations. Timing of application and weed size did not significantly affect herbicide activity, even at later application timings when weeds were well established and exceeded 60 cm in height.en
dc.description.degreeM.S.en
dc.format.extentvii, 60 leavesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/104317en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 15044521en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V855 1986.D384en
dc.subject.lcshCornen
dc.subject.lcshHerbicidesen
dc.subject.lcshNo-tillageen
dc.titleEvaluation of herbicides for no-till corn establishmenten
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplinePlant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Scienceen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V855_1986.D384.pdf
Size:
15.6 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections