Using Discourse Opportunity as a Measure of Potential Power in Zoning Amendments

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorFiutak, Geoffrey Paulen
dc.contributor.committeechairMisra, Shalinien
dc.contributor.committeememberBuehler, Ralphen
dc.contributor.committeememberCowell, Margaret M.en
dc.contributor.departmentUrban Affairs and Planningen
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-10T09:02:04Zen
dc.date.available2025-01-10T09:02:04Zen
dc.date.issued2025-01-09en
dc.description.abstractThe United States Supreme Court and lower courts have deemed zoning to be one of the most essential powers of local governments (Cooper, Knotts, and Brennan, 2008) (Albemarle County, 2018). This paper examines the zoning amendment, one of the many processes that comprise local government in the United States. I explore a phenomenon of public frustration in the zoning amendment process to develop a better understanding of it and contribute to the larger body of knowledge concerning the relationship between public participation and zoning amendment decisions. In a case study, I use detailed process tracing and records analysis to uncover the specific mechanisms that constrain the public's opportunity for discourse with powerbrokers before a critical influencing point. The lack of discourse opportunity creates a power imbalance with special interest which could contribute to the public's frustration in zoning amendments. However, I also discover where moderately easy changes could improve the opportunities for participation which quality participation techniques can leveraged into power for the public.en
dc.description.abstractgeneralThe United States Supreme Court and lower courts have deemed zoning to be one of the most essential powers of local governments (Cooper, Knotts, and Brennan, 2008) (Albemarle County, 2018). This paper examines the zoning amendment, one of the many processes that comprise local government in the United States. I explore a phenomenon of public frustration in the zoning amendment process to develop a better understanding of it and contribute to the larger body of knowledge concerning the relationship between public participation and zoning amendment decisions. In a case study, I closely examine government processes and records to determine how they constrain the public's opportunity for discourse with powerbrokers before a critical influencing point. The lack of discourse opportunity creates a power imbalance with special interest which could contribute to the public's frustration in zoning amendments. However, I also discover moderately easy changes that could improve the opportunities for participation and the power of the public.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Urban and Regional Planningen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:42126en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/124091en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectzoningen
dc.subjectzoning amendmentsen
dc.subjectpublic participationen
dc.subjectland use lawen
dc.subjectlocal governmenten
dc.subjectpublic poweren
dc.titleUsing Discourse Opportunity as a Measure of Potential Power in Zoning Amendmentsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineUrban and Regional Planningen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Urban and Regional Planningen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Fiutak_GP_T_2025.pdf
Size:
5.92 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Masters Theses