Analysis of Energy Recommendations in the U.S. Wood Products Industry

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBauman, Michael Justinen
dc.contributor.committeechairBond, Brian H.en
dc.contributor.committeememberQuesada, Henry Joseen
dc.contributor.committeememberWiedenbeck, Janice K.en
dc.contributor.departmentForest Resources and Environmental Conservationen
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-26T08:00:58Zen
dc.date.available2016-06-26T08:00:58Zen
dc.date.issued2016-06-25en
dc.description.abstractAs energy prices and demand are projected to increase globally and markets become more competitive nationally and internationally; the wood products industry must find ways to remain relevant. By: 1) analyzing energy-saving recommendations contained in the IAC database; 2) comparing those recommendations by criteria such as cost, savings, and payback period; 3) identifying recommendations that incorporate lean manufacturing principles; and 4) investigating the practices and perceptions of manufacturers at the facility level, this project provides information for identifying the greatest opportunities for energy management among U.S. wood product manufacturers. Results from the analysis of the IAC database show that wood product manufacturers had a low implementation rate of energy recommendations ranked purely by cost, savings, and payback period among wood product manufacturers suggesting they were not focused on implementing energy recommendations specifically based on those criteria. While some recommendations were found to be statistically different in at least one criteria: cost, savings, or payback period between wood and non-wood manufactures as well as primary and secondary wood manufacturers, only two recommendations had practical differences, large payback periods, between primary and secondary wood manufacturers. Twenty-four of 192 energy recommendations were classified as lean-based energy recommendations using the Kirby and Green (2003) methodology, however, there was no clear evidence to suggest the lean-based energy recommendations were superior in terms of cost, savings, or payback period when compared to simple energy recommendations. Interviews with primary and secondary manufacturers revealed a lack of commitment to energy performance improvement and the reported barriers of implementation among a small sample of wood products manufacturers suggests that the dissemination of energy management knowledge and benefits is a problem.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:8372en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/71467en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectEnergy Managementen
dc.subjectIndustrial Assessment Centersen
dc.subjectWood Product Manufacturingen
dc.subjectFurnitureen
dc.subjectLean Managementen
dc.subjectLean Manufacturingen
dc.titleAnalysis of Energy Recommendations in the U.S. Wood Products Industryen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineForest Productsen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Bauman_MJ_T_2016.pdf
Size:
7.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Masters Theses