VTechWorks staff will be away for the Thanksgiving holiday beginning at noon on Wednesday, November 27, through Friday, November 29. We will resume normal operations on Monday, December 2. Thank you for your patience.
 

Fetal Programming and Its Effects on Meat Quality of Nellore Bulls

dc.contributor.authorChristofaro Fernandes, Aríciaen
dc.contributor.authorBeline, Marianeen
dc.contributor.authorPolizel, Guilherme Henrique Gebimen
dc.contributor.authorCavalcante Cracco, Robertaen
dc.contributor.authorFerreira Dias, Evandro Fernandoen
dc.contributor.authorFurlan, Édisonen
dc.contributor.authorda Luz e Silva, Sauloen
dc.contributor.authorde Almeida Santana, Miguel Henriqueen
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-01T14:34:56Zen
dc.date.available2024-02-01T14:34:56Zen
dc.date.issued2023-11-24en
dc.date.updated2023-12-22T13:44:57Zen
dc.description.abstractThis work aimed to evaluate the effects of prenatal nutritional stimulation at different pregnancy stages on carcass traits and meat quality in bovine progeny. For this purpose, 63 Nellore bulls, born from cows submitted to three nutritional plans, were used: not programmed (NP), which did not receive protein supplementation; partially programmed (PP), which had protein-energy supplementation (0.3% of mean body weight of each batch) only in the final third of pregnancy; and full programming (FP), which received supplementation (0.3% of mean body weight of each batch) throughout pregnancy. The averages of parameters were submitted to the ANOVA, and the supplementation periods, which were different when <i>p</i> value &lt; 0.05, were compared. Carcass weights and rib eye area (REA) did not differ between treatments (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), but subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) showed a tendency (<i>p</i> = 0.08) between groups. For lipids and marbling, no differences were found (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). In the analyses of maturation time and shelf life, no difference was observed between treatments. However, there was a tendency between treatments at 14 days of maturation time for cooking loss (CL) (<i>p</i> = 0.08). Treatments did not affect shear force in the progenies (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Fetal programming had no effect on the meat quality of Nellore bulls.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationChristofaro Fernandes, A.; Beline, M.; Polizel, G.H.G.; Cavalcante Cracco, R.; Ferreira Dias, E.F.; Furlan, É.; da Luz e Silva, S.; de Almeida Santana, M.H. Fetal Programming and Its Effects on Meat Quality of Nellore Bulls. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 672.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10120672en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/117816en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectadiposeen
dc.subjectbeef cattleen
dc.subjectmaternal nutritionen
dc.subjectmuscle developmenten
dc.subjectprenatal supplementationen
dc.titleFetal Programming and Its Effects on Meat Quality of Nellore Bullsen
dc.title.serialVeterinary Sciencesen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
vetsci-10-00672.pdf
Size:
347.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: