The acute metabolic and hemodynamic effects of body inversion during rest and exercise

Abstract

Suspension of the body in the head-down posture (90° below the horizontal) for traction and added resistance to exercise has generated considerable interest in recent years. However, recent investigators of inversion have cautioned individuals not to participate in such activities until further research could be performed on the effects of exercise in the head-down position.

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the acute metabolic and hemodynamic responses of men at rest and during exercise in the inverted posture (90° head-down tilt) versus the supine and standing postures. The parameters investigated were oxygen consumption(V̇O₂), heart rate(HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure(DBP). Eleven male recreational athletes underwent 6 sessions of postural change. The baseline posture was sitting and the critical positions were supine, standing, and inverted. The subjects were asked to remain in each of these postures for three minutes. In the first 2 sessions, oxygen consumption(V̇O₂), was measured at rest and during 45° hip-f1exion respectively, The V̇O₂ in the inverted posture at rest was found to be 1.7% greater than the V̇O₂ in the standing and the supine postures. V̇O₂ in the inverted posture during exercise was 7% and 36.5% greater than in the supine and standing postures, respective1y.

A statistical significance in HR at rest in the standing posture versus the inverted and supine postures was observed. During 45° hip-flexion activity, the HR in the standing posture was found to be significantly faster than the supine posture. The HR in the inverted posture was significantly faster than the supine posture as well.

At rest, there was no significant increase in SBP as re1ated to posture. During exercise, the SBP was significant1y greater; at rest in each of the postures.

Both postural and exercise factors significantly affected the DBP. The post-hoc analyses showed supine resting DBP was significantly lower than in the other two resting postures. During exercise, the standing BP was significantly greater than the supine and inverted DBP.

These data demonstrate: A) V̇O₂ in the supine and inverted postures is significantly greater than in the standing postures. B) a statistically significant increase in HR occurs in the standing posture as compared to the supine and inverted postures; however, it does not appear to be clinically significant, C) with the arms maintained in the anatomical position for all postural changes, the SBP was not significantly affected by the change of posture, but was significantly increased with exercise. D) and DBP in the standing posture was statistically greater than in the other two postures and DBP in the inverted posture was significantly elevated above that found in the supine posture.