Financing University Conference Centers: A Multiple Case Study Approach

dc.contributor.authorBlacka, Aaron E.en
dc.contributor.committeechairOlsen, Michael D.en
dc.contributor.committeememberKumar, Ramanen
dc.contributor.committeememberMihalik, Brian J.en
dc.contributor.departmentHospitality and Tourism Managementen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:46:59Zen
dc.date.adate2001-11-02en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:46:59Zen
dc.date.issued2001-09-26en
dc.date.rdate2002-11-02en
dc.date.sdate2001-10-23en
dc.description.abstractThe Co-Alignment Principle is a strategic management framework that guides value-added management. The model suggests that firms will perform successfully if they scan the environment for forces driving change and allocate their resources to industry-leading competitive methods that address environmental trends. When financing and managing a capital project, a firm's managers must think strategically and consider the "four pillars" of project valuation and management: (1) estimating future cash flows over the project's life cycle, (2) determining an appropriate cost of capital/rate of return, (3) assessing and managing operational and financial risk, and (4) investing in the appropriate materials and resources. The four pillars of project valuation and management act as a framework to guide this investigation on university conference center financing. The overall research question of this study asks how university officials make conference center investment decisions based on the four pillars of project valuation and management. To answer the research questions posed by this investigation, this study adopted a multiple case study approach, in which officials at five universities were interviewed about their universities' conference center projects. Interviews with two executive-level personnel at each university along with multiple sources of written documentation provided the basis for conclusions. Evidence from the data collection phase of this project indicates that universities follow similar procedures for financing their conference centers. For instance, they take advantage of low-cost, tax-exempt debt and private contributions to fund these capital projects. In addition, they place little emphasis on sensitivity analyses for cash flow projections and ignore the opportunity costs of capital. University conference center financing practices with respect to the four pillars of project valuation and management are not consistent with the recommendations set forth by traditional financial principles. This study concludes that universities should improve their strategic thinking and pay more attention to the four pillars in order to increase the viability of their conference center businesses.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen
dc.identifier.otheretd-10232001-121519en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-10232001-121519/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/35471en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartBlackaThesis.pdfen
dc.relation.haspartBlackaVita.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectfour pillarsen
dc.subjectrate of returnen
dc.subjectcost of capitalen
dc.subjectcash flowen
dc.subjectfinanceen
dc.subjectuniversity conference centersen
dc.subjectproject valuationen
dc.subjectcase studyen
dc.subjectrisken
dc.subjectinvestmenten
dc.titleFinancing University Conference Centers: A Multiple Case Study Approachen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineHospitality and Tourism Managementen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BlackaThesis.pdf
Size:
236.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BlackaVita.pdf
Size:
6.9 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format