VTechWorks staff will be away for the Thanksgiving holiday beginning at noon on Wednesday, November 27, through Friday, November 29. We will resume normal operations on Monday, December 2. Thank you for your patience.
 

Ruminal Fiber Degradation Kinetics within and among Warm-Season Annual Grasses as Affected by the Brown Midrib Mutation

dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Gonzaloen
dc.contributor.authorGalyon, Haileyen
dc.contributor.authorSilva-Reis, Ayelen I.en
dc.contributor.authorPereyra, Agustin A.en
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Emily S.en
dc.contributor.authorTeets, Christy L.en
dc.contributor.authorBlevins, Philen
dc.contributor.authorCockrum, Rebecca R.en
dc.contributor.authorAguerre, Matías J.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T16:41:12Zen
dc.date.available2022-10-13T16:41:12Zen
dc.date.issued2022-09-22en
dc.date.updated2022-10-13T12:58:10Zen
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to compare the nutritional composition and the neutral detergent fiber (NDF) degradation kinetics of brown midrib (BMR) and non-BMR genotypes within and across warm-season annual grasses. Four commercial varieties (two non-BMR and two BMR) of corn, sorghum, and pearl millet were planted in plots. Forage samples were incubated in the rumen of three rumen-cannulated cows for 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, and 240 h. On an NDF basis, all forage types showed lower acid detergent lignin (ADL) concentrations for BMR genotypes, but the magnitude of the difference differed among forage types. The concentration of undegraded NDF (uNDF; NDF basis) differed among forage types and between genotypes. Corn had the least, pearl millet had the intermediate, and sorghum had the greatest concentration of uNDF. Non-BMR genotypes had greater concentrations of uNDF than BMR genotypes. No interaction existed between forage type and genotype for the concentration of uNDF. In conclusion, although BMR forages may show lower ADL concentrations in the cell wall and greater NDF degradability than non-BMR forages of the same forage type, BMR forages do not always have the least ADL concentration or the greatest NDF degradability when comparing different forage types.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationFerreira, G.; Galyon, H.; Silva-Reis, A.I.; Pereyra, A.A.; Richardson, E.S.; Teets, C.L.; Blevins, P.; Cockrum, R.R.; Aguerre, M.J. Ruminal Fiber Degradation Kinetics within and among Warm-Season Annual Grasses as Affected by the Brown Midrib Mutation. Animals 2022, 12, 2536.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192536en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/112139en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectsummer annual foragesen
dc.subjectbrown midriben
dc.subjectfiber digestion kineticsen
dc.subjectdegradation rateen
dc.titleRuminal Fiber Degradation Kinetics within and among Warm-Season Annual Grasses as Affected by the Brown Midrib Mutationen
dc.title.serialAnimalsen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
animals-12-02536.pdf
Size:
719.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: